Related papers: Holographic correspondence between electrodynamics…

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors; the main conclusion is incorrect, as some of the crucial calculations were not properly converged.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to new results to be added.

Paper withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn due to disagreement of suggested results and methods between authors.

This paper was withdrawn (temporarily?) by the author since an error needs to be corrected.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a critical error in the proof of Theorem A pointed out by Burkhard Wilking.

The paper has been withdrawn by the authors

This paper has been withdrawn.

The paper is withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a critical mistake on page 3.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, since now all four parts of the review are available as a single file 0804.1639. I also made some revision of the text in order to avoid misprints and some inaccurate expressions.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the incorrect application of the divergence theorem to Eqs 7, 8 and 9.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the proof of Theorem 1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to serious flaws in certain proofs. For instance, the method used to construct certain automorphic representations is flawed.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a error in attachment of source file.

This paper has been withdrawn due to a missing hypothesis in the main statement.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the formulation.

This paper is withdrawn.

This paper is being withdrawn because an error was discovered in lemma 4.3. Although the rest of the paper appears to be correct, this error invalidates the proof of theorem 3.1 and theorem 3.3.