Related papers: Reply to 'Comment on "Solution of the Relativistic…

We correct several errors in Phys. Rev. D 66, 094011 (2002). [arXiv:hep-ph/0205210].

An error in the paper [J. Math. Phys. 43, 6343 (2002); math-ph/0207009] is corrected. Further explanation is given.

I reply to the comment by Dr S. Nishigaki (hep-th/0007042) to my papers Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 056005 and Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 016005.

Erratum to Int. J. Quantum Chem. v. 89, pp. 57-85 (2002)

We provide our reply to the comment by Greiter and Schuricht (cond-mat/0511607).

This is an erratum to our paper.

After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…

This is a reply to a comment (gr-qc/0610098) written by Nieves and Pal about our paper (gr-qc/0605153) published in Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 041101 (2006).

Reply to the Comment physics/0307134 by A. Helmstetter and D. Sornette

The formulas in the above Erratum are corrected.

This is erratum of the paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 4260 (2000)]

Erratum for paper "Light-induced desorption of alkali-metal atoms from paraffin coating" [Phys. Rev. A 66, 042903 (2002).

Here we give our reply to the comment by Sibirtsev et al on our paper ``Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of the N*(1535)".

The paper contains critical comments to the paper mentioned in the title from the mathematical point of view

There are some points in the reply of Horton et al. [http://stacks.iop.org/JPhysA/35/7963] to my comment [quant-ph/0202140] on their paper [quant-ph/0103114] which I cannot let stand without a response. I provide here some clarification of…

We present the correct solution of the Dirac equation in 1+1 dimensions with the Lorentz scalar potential V(x)=g|x|.

The Response [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187102 (2024)] of Inoue and coworkers to my Comment [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187101 (2024)] on their original paper [J. Chem. Phys. 159, 054105 (2023)] clarifies some points put forward in my Comment, but also…

We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).

We respond to `Comments on the U(2) ADHM two-instanton' [Y. Tian, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 183].

We reply to P. Forg\'acs, T. Herpay, and P. Kov\'acs (arXiv: 1202.6289).