Related papers: Comment on ``Casimir force in compact non-commutat…
In a recent Letter [B. K. Sahoo, B. P. Das, and H. Spiesberger, Phys. Rev. D 103, L111303 (2021)], a calculation of the parity violating 6S-7S E1 amplitude in Cs is reported, claiming an uncertainty of just 0.3%. In this Comment, we point…
These supplementary notes in the ArXiv are a companion to our paper "Bocher contractions of conformally superintegrable Laplace equations" [arXiv:1512.09315]. They contain background material and the details of the extensive computations…
We provide updated predictions for elastic \gamma ${}^3$He cross sections and asymmetries that correct erroneous results we published in Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 232303 (2007) and Nucl. Phys. A 819, 98 (2009).
We have reviewed the Comment of Geyer et al. [arXiv:0708.1548] concerning our recent work [Phys. Rev. A 75, 060102 (R) (2007)], and while we disagree with their criticisms, we acknowledge them for giving us the opportunity to add…
We review the results of our previous publication [Phys. Rev. D63, 116001 (2001); hep-ph/0012226] in the light of recent calculations and comments.
This article is a thorough critique to the Weniger's comments made to our papers published in prestigious journals in the recent years. A detailed and critical examination of the arguments that led to the suggested comment by Weniger…
We present a method of computing Casimir forces for arbitrary geometries, with any desired accuracy, that can directly exploit the efficiency of standard numerical-electromagnetism techniques. Using the simplest possible finite-difference…
In this small note we correct an error made by Mohammadi et al. in their paper entitled "On Skew Cyclic Codes Over A Finite Ring" ( Iranian Jl. Math. Sci. Inform. Vol 14 (1) (2019), 135-145).
In [Ritika Garg et al., Phys. Rev. C 100, 069901(E) (2019)] the experimental results on the polarization asysmetry were revised due to a claimed change of the geometry asymmetry. However, the revised results can not be reproduced as claimed…
The shift of nanosized metal configurations relative to one another can lead to an increase in the range of optimal lengths of wings and angles of the opening of cavities, at which noncompensated Casimir forces in them are maximal. The…
Sec I - Introduction Sec II - Equilibrium properties: generalities and methodology Sec III - Equilibrium properties: some important quantities Sec IV - Dynamical properties: heuristic approach Sec V - Dynamical properties: stochastic…
The Casimir effect is a force arising in the macroscopic world as a result of radiation pressure of vacuum fluctuations. It thus plays a key role in the emerging domain of nano-electro-mechanical systems (NEMS). This role is reviewed in the…
We discuss the recent paper by A. Dar\'os and L.K. Arruda (On the instability of elliptic traveling wave solutions of the modified Camassa-Holm equation, J. Diff. Equat., 266 (2019), 1946-1968). Our intention is to correct some…
This paper presents comprehensive calculations for thermal and first-order radiative corrections to the Casimir energy in systems involving self-interacting massive and massless scalar fields coupled with {\ae}ther in a fifth compact…
Electromagnetic Casimir stresses are of relevance to many technologies based on mesoscopic devices such as MEMS embedded in dielectric media, Casimir induced friction in nano-machinery, micro-fluidics and molecular electronics. Computation…
I point out that the authors' interpretation of their calculations differs from the standard interpretation, described in Sect. 84 of Landau-Lifshitz book. This casts doubt on the authors' claim that Sagnac effect "arises also in…
We explain and correct a mistake in Section 2.6 and Appendix C of the first and second author's paper "Representation Growth and Rational Singularities of the Moduli Space of Local Systems" arXiv:1307.0371.
It is shown that recent criticism by C. R. Hagen (hep-th/9902057) questioning the validity of stress tensor treatments of the Casimir energy for space divided into two parts by a spherical boundary is without foundation.
We make remarks on Ristroph and Zhang's [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} 101, 194502 (2008)] paper.
We make remarks on Fern\'{a}ndez Guasti's paper [{\it J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.} 39 (2006) 11825-11832] by pointing out some mistakes Fern\'{a}ndez Guasti derived therein.