Related papers: Reply to: Comments on ``Analytic and Numerical Stu…

We reply to arXiv:1508.00203 `Comment on "Identifying Functional Thermodynamics in Autonomous Maxwellian Ratchets" (arXiv:1507.01537v2)'.

No abstract given. Contents: I. Definition and Introduction II. Schelling Model III. Opinion Dynamics IV. Languages, Hierarchies and Football V. Future Directions

Here we reply to the comment of Li et al. (arXiv:2009.09377) on the preprint (arXiv:2003.00760) of our publication (Z. Naturforsch. A 75, 803-807; DOI:10.1515/zna-2020-0204).

Comment on Scafetta, Nicola. 'Discussion on Common Errors in Analyzing Sea Level Accelerations, Solar Trends and Global Warming.' arXiv:1305.2812 (May 13, 2013a). doi:10.5194/prp-1-37-2013.

Very recently Leitner et al. [Thermochimica Acta 572 (2013) 1-5] have tried to extract the thermodynamic data of rock-salt ZnO from ab initio and experimental data available in the literature. In this Comment we show that neglecting (i) the…

Reply to the Comment [arXiv:1609.04476] on a recent work in PRL [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 036601 (2016), arXiv:1511.02994v2].

This is a Reply to the Comment [arXiv:0807.0699] on our paper [PRL 100:232002 (2008)].

We provide a reply to a comment by I. Goychuk arXiv:1501.06996 [cond-mat.stat-mech] (not under active consideration with Phys. Rev. Lett.) on our Letter A. Rebenshtok, S. Denisov, P. H\"anggi, and E. Barkai, {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf…

We reply to the comment [M. Denis, T. Fleig, arXiv:1605.03091v1 (2016)] on paper [L.V. Skripnikov and A.V. Titov, J. Chem. Phys. 142, 024301 (2015)].

The Comments are devoted to the paper ``Solutions of Multitime Reaction-Diffusion PDE'' (Mathematics, vol. 10 (2022), 3623), in which main results are misleading and can be derived in a simple way from those obtained earlier. Moreover, it…

We comment on recent e-print by L. Mardoyan et al. [cond-mat/0609768]

A comment on the letter by M. Machida and T. Koyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 140401 (2005) and also on the preprint by Y. Kawaguchi and T. Ohmi, cond-mat/0411018.

Critiques presented by P. Grassberger in Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 140601 (2005) are addressed.

We provide a reply to a comment by I. Goychuk arXiv:1708.04155, version v2 from 27 Aug 2017 (not under active consideration with Phys. Rev. Lett.), on our Letter E. Aghion, D. A. Kessler and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 260601 (2017).

We commend the authors for an exciting paper which provides a strong contribution to the emerging field of probabilistic numerics (PN). Below, we discuss aspects of prior modelling which need to be considered thoroughly in future work.

We reply to Dukelsky, et al. regarding the article: L. A. Wu, M. S. Byrd and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057904 (2002).

This is a reply to the paper by S.C.Benjamin, quant-ph/0008127.

This paper replies the comments by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 75, 844-845 (2007)] and V. Hnizdo [Am. J. Phys. 75, 845-846 (2007)].

A comment on cond-mat/0210707, cond-mat/0208230, cond-mat/0207153, and cond-mat/0202140.

Comment on: L.F. Cugliandolo and J.L. Iguain; Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85} 3448 (2000)