Related papers: Reply to: Comments on ``Analytic and Numerical Stu…

In a recent paper Boyanovsky et al (hep-ph/9608205) studied preheating for a particular theory of the inflaton field. Although they results essentially confirm those of the original papers on reheating after inflation, they claimed that…

A comment on the preprint "Towards a quantitative kinetic theory of polar active matter" by T. Ihle, arXiv:1401.8056.

A reply to the comment by S. Friedemann et al. [arXiv:1207.0536] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].

We reply to P. Forg\'acs, T. Herpay, and P. Kov\'acs (arXiv: 1202.6289).

This is a comment on "How to Observe Coherent Electron Dynamics Directly" [H. J. Suominen and A. Kirrander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 043002 (2014)].

Comment on the paper J. Solsvik and E. Manger, "Kinetic theory models for granular mixtures with unequal granular temperature: Hydrodynamic velocity," Phys. Fluids \textbf{33}, 043321 (2021).

This note contains my response to the comment written by J. Franklin on my paper ``Covariant formulation of electrodynamics in isotropic media''.

Howes et al. Reply to Comment on "Kinetic Simulations of Magnetized Turbulence in Astrophysical Plasmas" arXiv:0711.4355

Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).

A reply on the comment of Bertin, Chate, Ginelli, Gregoire, Leonard and Peshkov, arxiv:1404.3950v1, in this special issue.

A reply to the comment by V. R. Shaginyan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 279701 (2011), arXiv:1206.5372] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].

The work is a comments on the article of V. G. Pal'chikov, Yu. L. Sokolov, and V. P. Yakovlev, devoted to the measurement of the Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom and published in Physica Scripta, 55 (1997) 33-40.

A reply to the comment by Lee et al. [arXiv:1309.5367]

We comment on various incorrect claims made in a recent paper by Grosu et al. (cond-mat/0101392).

We respond to, and comment upon, a number of points raised in a recent paper by Kofman, Linde, and Mukhanov.

Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.

We reply to Belitz and Kirkpatrick comment cond-mat/0102064, on cond-mat/0101392.

We comment upon a numerical computation in a recent paper by Balasubramanian, Buchel, Green, Lehner, and Liebling.

A diagram that represents both conservation of energy and constancy of entropy in Carnot cycle.

Comments on the article "Pulsar dynamics: magnetic dipole model revisited".