Related papers: Comment to the review by L. Glozman, hep-ph/070108…

This is a Comment to the recent 3 papers by S.S. Afonin

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].

Response to Comment by A. Bussmann-Holder (arXiv:0909.3603)

We provide our reply to the comment by Greiter and Schuricht (cond-mat/0511607).

This is a reply to a comment by P. Schlottmann and A.A. Zvyagin.

This is a brief response to a recent posting by Gross.

Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).

This is a comment on two recent arXiv postings.

We remark on the validity of the concerns raised in the comment(cond-mat/0304626) by Fal'ko, Lerner, Tsyplyatyev, and Aleiner..

The above hep-th posting purports -- erroneously -- to be a comment on a Note by me in gr-qc.

Remarks on reply (cond-mat/0206368) to Johansen's comment (cond-mat/0205249)

We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).

I reply to Professor Peter van Nieuwenhuizen in connection with hep-th/0408137

Reply to the Comment physics/0307134 by A. Helmstetter and D. Sornette

This note is the follow up to a paper by M. Waldschmidt.

A few final comments on arXiv:1210.7548 are given to confute incorrect arguments claimed there.

This is a reply to Professor Yehia Comments in arXiv:1305.0026

The recent paper nucl-th/0012037 by Moretto et al. is commented