Related papers: Reply to Comment on "Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of…
This is a comment on [G. Knight and R. Klages, Phys. Rev. E 84, 041135 (2011); also available at arXiv:1107.5293v2 [math-ph]].
This is a comment on the paper ``Electron Mass Operator in a Strong Magnetic Field and Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking" by A. V. Kuznetsov and N. V. Mikheev [Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011601]. We show that the main conclusions of the…
The work is a comments on the article of V. G. Pal'chikov, Yu. L. Sokolov, and V. P. Yakovlev, devoted to the measurement of the Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom and published in Physica Scripta, 55 (1997) 33-40.
This is a comment to a letter by D. Mandal, K. Klymko and M. R. DeWeese published as Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 258001 (2017).
We extend the relativistic point coupling model to single-$\Lambda$ hypernuclei. For this purpose, we add $N$-$\Lambda$ effective contact couplings to the model Lagrangian, and determine the parameters by fitting to the experimental data…
No abstract available, since this is a Comment on a published article (cf. title)
We respond to the criticisms of a recent paper of Buchert et al. [arXiv:1505.07800]
We show that the claims expressed in the Comment arXiv:0810.3244v1 by R.S. Decca et al against our paper, D.A.R. Dalvit and S.K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 101}, 163203 (2008), are wrong and manifestly inconsistent with basic…
We reply to the Comment by Hartmann (cond-mat/9908132) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2026 (also cond-mat/9907125).
This is a reply to the comment by M. Kastner and M. Promberger [cond-mat/0011516] on the paper published in J. Stat. Phys. 99, 691 (2000) and also in cond-mat/0002176. We show that all their criticisms do not apply.
I. Caprini's, G. Colangelo's, and H. Leutwyler's (CCL) article "Mass and Width of the Lowest Resonance in QCD", Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 132001 (2006) [hep-ph/0512364], is critically reviewed. The present comment is devoted to complement a…
Leonhardt and Piwnicki reply to Visser's ``Comment on `Relativistic Effects of Light in Moving Media with Extremely Low Group Velocity' ''.
Reply to a comment by T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and C. W von Keyserlingk [arXiv:2010.07969].
We reply to Dukelsky, et al. regarding the article: L. A. Wu, M. S. Byrd and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057904 (2002).
I reply to the comment by Dr S. Nishigaki (hep-th/0007042) to my papers Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 056005 and Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 016005.
I reply to A. Mitra's comment on my PRL paper "Bare quark matter surfaces of strange stars and $e^+e^-$ emission". I show that his points of criticism are not correct.
This is the reply to the comment by I. S. Burmistrov, P. D. Kurilovich, and V. D. Kurilovich [arXiv:1903.047241] on our paper "Noise in the helical edge channel anisotropically coupled to a local spin" [JETP Lett. 108, 664 (2018),…
Comment on cond-mat/0205390; PRL 90, 026805 (2003)
Reply to Comments by Lambrecht, Jaekel, and Reynaud, and by Garcia and Levanyuk, submitted to Physical Review Letters.
We reply to comment on recent paper by Pieplow and Henkel (New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 023027) and our results made by Volokitin and Persson (arXiv: 1405.2525)