Related papers: Reply to Comment on "Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of…

We comment on a recent paper by B.C. Liu and B.S. Zou [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 042002 (2006)] where it was argued that the coupling of the N*(1535) to K\Lambda is even larger than its coupling to the \eta N channel. Specifically, we point out…

Using resonance isobar model and effective Lagrangian approach, from recent BES results on $J/\psi\to\bar pp\eta$ and $\psi\to\bar pK^+\Lambda$, we deduce the ratio between effective coupling constants of $N^*(1535)$ to $K\Lambda$ and…

Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.

We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).

Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).

We provide our reply to the comment by Greiter and Schuricht (cond-mat/0511607).

This is a reply to the comment by J. L. Alonso et al. (arXiv:1302.6146; to appear in J. Chem. Phys) on our paper A. Abedi, N. T. Maitra, and E. K. U. Gross, J. Chem. Phys. 137, 22A530 (2012) [arXiv: 1208.4388]

We have reviewed the comment in [3], posted on arXiv.org concerning our recent work in [1]. We reply to the comment in this paper.

This is a reply to the comment by A. W. Sandvik (cond-mat/0010433) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4204 (2000). We show that his data do not conflict with our data nor with our conclusions.

We strongly doubt the claimed priority of this work as the first full three-body calculation of the considered reaction.

We reply to David's comment (hep-lat/9504017) on our paper Phys.Rev.Lett. 74(1995)1920.

It is argued in [1] that when the strong coupling to the K Lambda channel is considered, Breit-Wigner mass of the lightest orbital excitation of the nucleon N(1535) shifts to a lower value. The new value turned out to be smaller than the…

This combines a reply to the Comment [hep-th/0203067 v1] by A. N. Vaidya and R. de L. Rodrigues with an erratum to our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 210405 (2001)]

Reply to the Comment physics/0307134 by A. Helmstetter and D. Sornette

This is our reply to comment (hep-ph/0206289) on our paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011601].

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

We offer o reply for the comments of Rapisarda et al. cond-mat/0601409 on our letter "Entropy of Classical Systems with Long Range Interactios", published in Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol 95 (2005) 190601.

Reply to the preceding comment by Rolf Schilling and Bernhard Schmid [arXiv:1101.5577, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 049601 (2011)].

A response to commenter Ke Lan's comment on our paper published in Nature Communications (2023)14:5782 by J. Yan et al

Certain comments on the paper of Yu.V. Orlov, B. F. Irgaziev and L. I. Nikitina published in Phys.At.Nuclei, {\bf 73} (2010) 757 are made.