Related papers: Not satisfied about the analysis
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s) in the light of several other works available and due to a misunderstanding in the authorships.
While much research focused on producing explanations, it is still unclear how the produced explanations' quality can be evaluated in a meaningful way. Today's predominant approach is to quantify explanations using proxy scores which…
This paper has been withdrawn because the author no longer believes the firewall argument is correct.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.
We withdraw the paper because the results are wrong.
It is shown that theories already presented as rigorous mathematical formalizations of widespread manipulations of Dirac's delta function are all unsatisfactory, and a new alternative is proposed.
This note rebuts an old, but recurring claim by Antoniou, Davis and Diakonos [1] that the critical point and associated critical exponents reported in Ref. [2], is based on an erroneous treatment of scaling relations near the critical…
It is common to evaluate a set of items by soliciting people to rate them. For example, universities ask students to rate the teaching quality of their instructors, and conference organizers ask authors of submissions to evaluate the…
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. Because of a misunderstanding, the paper was submitted prematurely to the arXiv. A replacement will follow.
This work first presents our attempts to establish an automated model using state-of-the-art approaches for analysing bias in search results of Bing and Google. Experimental results indicate that the current class-wise F1-scores of our best…
In this communication we refute a criticism concerning results of our work [3] that was presented in references [1] and [2].
This paper has been withdrawn by the author: it was a too preliminary version.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a gap in the proof of the main result.
Aligning large language models with expert judgment is especially difficult in subjective evaluation tasks, where experts may disagree, rely on tacit criteria, and change their judgments over time. In this paper, we study expert alignment…
arXiv admin comment: This version has been removed by arXiv administrators as the submitter did not have the rights to agree to the license at the time of submission
We give a new bound of concurrence.
We demonstrate that the concerns expressed by Garcia et al. are misplaced, due to (1) a misreading of our findings in [1]; (2) a widespread failure to examine and present words in support of asserted summary quantities based on word usage…
The paper "Evaluation of Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey" [1] proposes a new, much shorter, version of the CLASS based on standard factor analysis. In this comment we explain why we believe the analysis that is used is…
Flaw in the treatment of different spin components
Some mistaken reasonings at the end of the paper omitted.