Related papers: Optical theorem and the cutting rules
This paper has been withdrawn for extensive revision.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in Theorem 3.4.
This paper is withdrawn because it is superseded by arXiv:0710.4284
The proof of Theorem 11 of the paper M. Scheepers, Remarks on countable tightness, Topology and its Applications 161 (2014), 407 - 432 relies on Lemma 10 of that paper. The offered proof of Lemma 10 had shortcomings, and I was recently…
This paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn.
The article is taken out.
We provide a brief summary of the observed sum rule anomalies in the high-T$_c$ cuprate materials. A recent issue has been the impact of a non-infinite frequency cutoff in the experiment. In the normal state, the observed anomalously high…
This paper has been withdrawn, because it is subsumed by the new preprint arXiv:0806.4540 .
Paper withdrawn, see math-ph/0505072
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, since now all four parts of the review are available as a single file 0804.1639. I also made some revision of the text in order to avoid misprints and some inaccurate expressions.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in Lemma 3, making the (bijective) proof of Theorem 4 and Corollary 5 invalid (symmetry of k-nonnesting and k-noncrossing set partitions).
The original versions (1 and 2) of this paper paper contain a fatal error. All my attempts to patch the error have failed. As a service to the community I explain the error in some detail.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors and replaced by the revised version in arXiv:0709.1772.
This is the original version of my Ph.D. thesis. The main results have been divided up between papers arXiv:2111.09784 and arXiv:2204.10924. This paper has been kept on the arXiv to preserve some proofs of elementary lemmas that will be…
This submission has been withdrawn by the authors because it is a duplicate of arXiv:hep-ph/0611336. It was due to a technical submission error by the authors.
The author decided to withdraw this paper by 1) an error in Lemma 5.11 (and 5.12) which requires some justification; 2) the main result of this paper suffers overlap with arXiv:1203.5254; 3) the author decided to split arXiv:1203.5254 into…
The goal of this short note is to show that the formulas I derived originally in [Phys. Rev. A 65, 022308 (2002)] regarding the errors introduced in quantum logical operations by the quantum nature of the control fields apply even in the…
The article is taken out.
This paper has been superseded by hep-ph/0510352.