Related papers: Baryon Number Violation in tau, D and B Decays
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), because it contains erroneous conclusion. Some part of the contents of the paper may be used in a future communication.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author. There is an error on page 3 in the last inequality before Lemma 1.1.
The paper is withdrawn.
This paper has been retracted.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial error in calculation.
The anomalously large experimentally measured ratios of the semitauonic decay $B\rightarrow D^{(*)} +\tau+\nu$ and the corresponding semileptonic $B\rightarrow D^{*} +\l+\bar{\nu}_l$ disagree with the predictions of the standard E.W + QCD…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author because Lemma 3 is incorrect. This mistake is crucial in this paper.
The paper is being withdrawn. A new submission will follow.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors
This paper has been withdrawn by Chien-Yu, Chen due to the authors fields error.
The first evidence for the decay $B^-\rightarrow D^{**0}\tau^-\overline{\nu_{\tau}}$ is obtained using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9 fb$^{-1}$ , at…
This paper has been temporarily withdrawn, due to an error in Eq. (3).
This paper has been withdrawn due to an error in section 3.
This paper has been withdrawn due to a photometric calibration error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a serious flaw that needs to be fixed. That is in progress by the author.
There are several serious errors in this paper. I thought to have time to fix it, but it did not occur for years. So I withdraw this paper.
This paper has been withdrawn, because the argument for generation of Goldstone modes is incorrect.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to the insecurity against attacks received in quant-ph/0605027v5.
This paper has been withdrawn due to an error, and no further revisions will be made.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because the paper is largely revised and improved.