Related papers: Baryon Number Violation in tau, D and B Decays

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to errors in the figures.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to rewritting and skipping crucial sign errors.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. We have discovered an error in the evaluation of the diagram, which invalidates our conclusion.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in Proposition 3.1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due a crucial mistake in Lemma 2

This paper is wrong and is therefore withdrawn.

The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a gap in Proof of Theorem 1.1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, because a profoundly overhauled and improved version, also with a new title and two more authors, has now been submitted to the arXiv, with no. hep-ph/0310059. In view of the elapsed time and the…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial mistakes.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to a significant error in section 4.3.1.

This paper has been withdrawn

This paper has been withdrawn due to an error in figure 5.

This paper has been withdrawn due a crucial mistake due to a crucial mistake in the proof of Lemma 2.3.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due to a mistake which invalidates the analysis. One can never detect the presence of I=0 new physics in B -> pi pi.

Proton stability seems to constrain rather strongly any baryon number violating process. We investigate the possibility of baryon number violating processes involving right-handed dynamics or higher generation quarks. Our results strongly…

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to an unlikely results.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to serious error found in main argument.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due an error in the proof of Proposion 2.13.