Related papers: Optical Theorem, cutting rules and unstable partic…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to serious flaws in certain proofs. For instance, the method used to construct certain automorphic representations is flawed.

This paper was withdrawn by the author because severe errors were discovered.

This manuscript has been withdrawn due to less meaning.

This paper is withdrawn because of an error in Lemma 3.1

This paper has been withdrawn for extensive revision.

This paper has been withdrawn due to an incorrect analysis in Section 4.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn due to a photometric calibration error.

This paper has been withdrawn due to a missing hypothesis in the main statement.

This paper has been withdraw by the authors. An enlarged and complete analysis of the constraints is presented in hep-th/9910163. It includes also relativistic particles and strings. The non-relativistic particle quantization has been…

The paper is being withdrawn because of some theoretical inconsistencies.

The paper is being withdrawn. A new submission will follow.

The present note is to make minor correction on the assumption of Theorem 1.2 and its proof in our paper [arXiv:2111.02059, Jinrui Huang, Yinghui Wang, Huanyao Wen and Rizhao Zi, {\it J. Differential Equations}, 306(2022), 456--491].

Two different versions of an optical theorem for a scattering body embedded inside a lossy background medium are derived in this paper. The corresponding fundamental upper bounds on absorption are then obtained in closed form by elementary…

This paper has been withdrawn

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to errors in the figures.

This paper is withdrawn. We found a mistake in Lemma 4.1

This submission has been withdrawn at the request of the author.

This paper was withdrawn by the author due to an edition's rights

This article has been removed. It has been superseded by gr-qc/0506097.