Related papers: Upper limits based on "loudest" events
This paper is withdrawn because the results in the paper are included in a paper to be published in Mathematical and Computer Modelling.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due an error in the proof of Proposion 2.13.
The paper has been withdrawn due to an error in the main theorem.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to an error in relation (11).
The article has been withdrawn - the proof of the final corollary turned out to rely on an unproven statement. If the authors will manage to repair the argument, resubmission will be made.
This paper has been withdrawn due to an error in the proof of the main theorem.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due an error involving the weak* convergence argument in section 2
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in Lemma 3.5.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due the copyright policy of the journal it has been submited to.
We present a universal method to include residual un-modeled background shape uncertainties in likelihood based statistical tests for high energy physics and astroparticle physics. This approach provides a simple and natural protection…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the computation of E(n,x) on page 6 which appears to be essential for the result. The author is currently trying to correct this proof
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the proof of Theorem 1.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a error in attachment of source file.
The methods used to prove the main result must be incorrect, as they can be used to arrive at a contradiction with previously known results. Thus the paper was withdrawn.
The principal results of this contribution are the weak and strong limits of maxima of contracted stationary Gaussian random sequences. Due to the random contraction we introduce a modified Berman condition which is sufficient for the weak…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author because Lemma 3 is incorrect. This mistake is crucial in this paper.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due an error in claim 1.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the proof.