Related papers: A Comment on hep-th/0608078
This paper has excessive overlap with the following papers also written by the authors or their collaborators: hep-th/0505013 and 0705.2930.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. It has been superseded by hep-th/0309154
This paper has been removed by arXiv administrators because it overlaps hep-th/0308070, and others. This paper also has excessive overlap with the following paper also written by the authors or their collaborators: gr-qc/0506061.
The paper has been temporarily withdrawn.
In this note, we show that a part of [5, Remark 2.2] is not correct. Some conditions are given under which the same holds.
We notice that the existing literature about the reaction e+e- --> hh suffers from a mistake in the relative sign between the t-channel and u-channel graphs. Correcting this lowers the crosssections by about an order of magnitude.
Lecture notes on selected topics in the theory of gravitation.
I use an instrumental approach to investigate some commonly made claims about interpretations of quantum mechanics, especially those that pertain questions of locality. The here presented investigation builds on a recently proposed taxonomy…
This is a reply to a comment on our work recently posted in arXiv. To our knowledge, this comment has not been published anywhere else. We show that the points raised in the comment are invalid
In this note we point out an error in the above paper and refer to some papers where this error is corrected and a more general theorem is proved.
This article has been withdrawn by arXiv administrators due to excessive unattributed and verbatim text overlap with the pre-existing Wikipedia article on redshift
This is a comment on the paper arXiv:1410.2840 by Ji and Jin, to appear in the AOAS.
An error in the paper [J. Math. Phys. 43, 6343 (2002); math-ph/0207009] is corrected. Further explanation is given.
In this note we provide a simple formula of general term of recurrent sequence.
comment on cond-mat/97063007 and cond-mat/9707289
This combines a reply to the Comment [hep-th/0203067 v1] by A. N. Vaidya and R. de L. Rodrigues with an erratum to our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 210405 (2001)]
The results in the preceding comment are placed on a more general mathematical foundation.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author because overcame by arXiv:0910.4694
The purpose of this brief article is to clarify certain distortions of the history of ideas about the quantum theory of de Sitter space that have appeared in recent literature.
The content of this paper is now available as part of arXiv:0902.1502