Related papers: A Comment on hep-th/0608078

A few final comments on arXiv:1210.7548 are given to confute incorrect arguments claimed there.

This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, hep-ph/0701081

This paper is a set of notes that we wrote concerning the first version of Emergent Gravity [gr-qc/0602022]. It is our version of an exercise that we proposed to some of our students. The idea was to find mathematical errors and…

A few remarks on hep-ph/9612213 are given.

This note is the follow up to a paper by M. Waldschmidt.

The paper of Unal [J. Math. Phys. 59, 062104 (2018)], though worthy of attention, contains a conclusion that is in error and may mislead the efforts to extend his results. The aim of the present note is twofold: we provide a correction to…

This is a comment on two recent arXiv postings.

This paper has been superseded by quant-ph/9908074.

I refute the criticisms of hep-ph/0311241 raised in hep-ph/0312151.

The paper presents a counterexample to the Hodge conjecture.

Withdrawn due to error. See D. Lowe, L. Susskind and J. Uglum, hep-th/9402136, for correct treatment. Apologies to all recipients.

The purpose of this note is to correct statements of some assertions in \cite{l}.

This is a Comment to the recent 3 papers by S.S. Afonin

Resubmitted as hep-ph/9502316. Removed from hep-th. Incorrigibly inept submitter publicly excoriated.

In this note, we show the mistake which has been made in quant-ph/0609176. Further more, we provide a sketch of proof to show the impossibility of the effort of such kind toward improving the efficiency of Grover's Algorithm.

We demonstrate that criticisms concerning our work nucl-th/9704043, made in the recent preprint hep-ph/9903352, are unfounded. The improvements over our results claimed in hep-ph/9903352 are in fact spurious, being based mainly on…

This note imparts heuristic arguments and theorectical evidences that contradict the abc conjecture over the rational numbers. In addition, the rudimentary datails for transforming this problem into the doimain of equidistribution theory…

In addition, our work has text overlap with arXiv:1804.06242, arXiv:1705.00938 by other authors. We want to rewrite this paper for avoiding this fact.

The purpose of this erratum is to correct a mistake in the proof of Theorem 4.1 of our paper \cite{CF}.

Comment on Causal Inference in the Medical Area [math.ST/0612783]