Related papers: Radiating Levi-Civita Spacetime
It is shown that the proposal of Ref. [1] of Casimir repulsion and nanolevitation based on chiral metamaterials is incompatible with the passivity and causality of the materials.
This paper has been withdrawn because the issues raised have been resolved by Cabibbo and Isidori, hep-ph/0502130.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.
We reply to a Comment on our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 232501 (2017), arXiv:1612.01502] by A. Deltuva and R. Lazauskas [Phys. Rev. Lett 123, 069201 (2019), arXiv:1904.00925].
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors as requested by the journal.
We provide a reply to a comment by I. Goychuk arXiv:1708.04155, version v2 from 27 Aug 2017 (not under active consideration with Phys. Rev. Lett.), on our Letter E. Aghion, D. A. Kessler and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 260601 (2017).
This paper has been withdrawn by the author because has been send to other journal.
This paper has been withdrawn by Reinaldo O. Vianna.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author
In this Letter I present an alternative solution of the path integral for the radial Coulomb problem which is based on a two-dimensional singular version of the Levi-Civita transformation.
This paper has been withdrawn by Wenji Deng (e-mail: [email protected]) for further modification at Oct. 12, 1998. {PACS: 03.75.Fi, 05.30.Jp.64.60.-i, 32.80.Pj}
Gates et al (astro-ph/9606132) have raised several issues in their Comment on our Letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 76, p.3886 (1996); astro-ph/9605001). We clarify these issues and show that our results are robust, and there is no…
This paper has been withdrawn because a much better version, G. Gazzola, M. C. Nemes and W. F. Wreszinski - On the Casimir Energy for a massive quantum scalar field and the cosmological constant- Annals of Physics (N.Y.) vol. 324, 2095-2107…
This paper has been withdrawn because it has been by far superseded by the Author's post arXiv:1108.1306v6, which was published on 30/08/2011.
We regret that PRL did not accept our Reply for publication. We believe that both our Reply and the original paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 135901 (2017)) is sound and correct. We post our reply here and let readers to judge.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors
This article has been withdrawn by arXiv administrators because it plagiarises arXiv:1006.4556 (published in Phys. Lett. B 693, 129 (2010)).
A comment to the authors' SRF Conference pre-print [1] was submitted by A. Gurevich to the arXiv [2]. In this response, we show that the arguments used in the comment are not valid. [1] arXiv:1309.3239 [2] arXiv:1309.5626
This paper has been withdrawn due to upload of another version of it as a new preprint: gr-qc/0404097