Related papers: Atomic equivalence violations via a massive and ma…

The paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to need of essential revision.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due to a mistake pointed out by Lenny Ng and Josh Sabloff.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a likely hole in the proof.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in equation (51).

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to the insecurity against attacks received in quant-ph/0605027v5.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.

This paper has been withdrawn because there is a fundamental error in the computations; with the right computational scheme it seems to be just a version of the Jones polynomial

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to an error in the proof of lemma 7.4. However, numerical evidence strongly suggest that this lemma is true.

The paper was withdrawn by the author. Further research is needed.

The paper has been permanently removed due to copyright issues.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error.

This paper was withdrawn by the author. It turns out that similar ideas have been presented before. The author apologizes.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due to the discovery of paper 0201028 which predates it and contains most of it's results.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial error in the data.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, since the reference citation were not appropriately arranged.

The paper is withdrawn because the analysis appeared to be incomplete.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation (5).