Related papers: Phase Transitions and all that

A recent paper [1] (El Aroudi, 2012) misapplied a critical condition (Fang and Abed, 2001) to a well-known example. Even if the mistake is corrected, the results in [1] are applicable only to buck converters and period-doubling bifurcation.…

This is a resubmission of preprint 9401008 , which has some TeXnical errors introduced by the "reform" procedure (designed to avoid precisely these problems!). The original can be formatted by editing out the messages "%% following line…

This paper ("Two-Level Chromophore and Irreversibility", which can be found at arXiv:0804.0086) has been withdrawn by the author due to too many errors and misleading statements. This paper has been superseded by Section 2.11 and Chapter 7…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author as a major revision is made and a new version is uploaded at arXiv:0812.3120

The contents of the paper is now covered in two separate papers arXiv:0904.2188 and arXiv:0904.2602. Please refer to those. Note that you can still access the original version arXiv:0711.4082v1.

This document contains all proofs omitted from our working paper 'Screening for breakthroughs'; specifically, the March 2025 version of the paper (arXiv:2011.10090v9).

This is our formal Reply to revised version (v2) of arXiv: nucl-th/0510004v2.

It is shown how simple assumptions lead to piecewise linear behavior, which is observed in certain phase transitions.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a crucial error in the optimization. For the last one month I have been trying to remove the error, but it seems to take a lot of time so I decided to withdraw this paper for the moment.

This paper is partly based on a lecture delivered by the author at the ERC workshop "Geometric Partial Differential Equations" held in Pisa in September 2012. What is presented here is an expanded version of that lecture.

A significant mathematical error is identified and corrected in a recent highly-cited paper on oscillatory flows of second-grade fluids [Fetecau & Fetecau (2005). Int. J. Eng. Sci., 43, 781--789]. The corrected solutions are shown to agree…

The Comments are devoted to the paper ``Solutions of Multitime Reaction-Diffusion PDE'' (Mathematics, vol. 10 (2022), 3623), in which main results are misleading and can be derived in a simple way from those obtained earlier. Moreover, it…

This paper has been withdrawn because the content has been substantially improved in a later paper, arXiv:0806.1165.

This is an erratum to our paper.

If accepted, the paper will be available at http://pubs.acs.org/journals/jpcbfh/

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to some technical problems in the paper.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author. The proof of the main result has a gap that the author does not know how to fix it.

First version: del Barco et al. submitted recently a comment [arXiv:0812.4070] on our latest Phys. Rev. Lett. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 237204 (2008)], claiming three basic mistakes. We show here that their claims are unjustified and based on…

In [A. Jackson, Explaining the ubiquity of phase transitions in decision problems (2025), arXiv:2501.14569], I established that phase transitions are always present in a large subset of decision problems over even-sized alphabets,…

This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial theoretical error.