Related papers: A response to the commentaries on CoRR

This is a comment on two recent arXiv postings.

This document contains a description of several of my papers, including remarks on history and connection with subsequent work. It also contains some new results and conjectures.

We make several comments on "Note on the Analytical Solution of the Rabi Model" (arXiv:1210.4946).

Short review article on quantum computation accepted for Supplement III, Encyclopaedia of Mathematics (publication expected Summer 2001). See also http://www.wkap.nl/series.htm/ENM

Comment on "The Need for Syncretism in Applied Statistics" [arXiv:1012.1161]

Response to Comment by A. Bussmann-Holder (arXiv:0909.3603)

This letter introduces a new, substantially simplified version of the branching recurrence operation of computability logic (see http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~giorgi/cl.html), and proves its equivalence to the old, "canonical" version.

We present some informal remarks on aspects of relativistic quantum computing.

Reference management software is a well-known tool for scientific research work. Since the 1980s, it has been the subject of reviews and evaluations in library and information science literature. This paper presents a systematic review of…

We respond to comments in arXiv:2502.15817v2 about our article, arXiv:2412.12282. We stand by our conclusions and defend them against the criticisms.

Comment: Monitoring Networked Applications With Incremental Quantile Estimation [arXiv:0708.0302]

Comment: Monitoring Networked Applications With Incremental Quantile Estimation [arXiv:0708.0302]

Comment on ``Boosting Algorithms: Regularization, Prediction and Model Fitting'' [arXiv:0804.2752]

Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]

Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]

Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]

This is the authors response to commentaries on the original article H is for Human and How (Not) to Evaluate Qualitative Research in HCI, https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2025.2475743 Commentaries were provided by: Jeffrey Bardzell,…

We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]

Comment: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]

Comment: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]