Related papers: Reply to Comment on "Stripes and the t-J Model"
This is a reply to "Comment on 'Noncommutative gauge theories and Lorentz symmetry,'" Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 048701 by Alfredo Iorio.
The Semiclassical Expansion of the t-J model. Lectures in the Jerusalem Winter School on Strongly Correlated Electrons, Dec. 1991, by Assa Auerbach, Physics Dept., Technion, Israel. LateX. Tech-102.
This is the Reply to the Comment by E. Thuneberg refuting the paper by E. B.Sonin [Phys. Rev. B 104, 094517 (2021)] as incorrect. The criticism is based on a misunderstanding of the goal and the approach of the paper and does not provide…
This is a comment on J. Schmittbuhl, A. Hansen, and G. G. Batrouni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 045505 (2003). They offer a reply, in turn.
A comment on the paper by Lopez et al. [A. Lopez, Z. Z. Sun, and J. Schliemann, Phys. Rev. B 85, 205428 (2012)].
We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, 087001 (2022), raised by Th\'eo S\'epulcre, Serge Florens, and Izak Snyman in arXiv:2210.00742.
A comment on a recent paper (PRL {\bf 94}, 226405 (2005)) by S. De Palo, M. Botti, S. Moroni, and Gaetano Senatore.
This is a comment on publication in Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 087205 (2003): ``Exchange interaction parameters and adiabatic spin-wave spectra of ferromagnets: A `renormalized magnetic force theorem'''
In this paper I have presented Comment on Anandan's paper (J. Anandan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1354 (2000)) [hep-th/9910018].
The tendencies to phase-separation and stripe formation of the t-J model on planes and four-leg ladders have been here reexamined including hole hopping terms t', t'' beyond nearest-neighbor sites. The motivation for this study is the…
We comment on a Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 080605 (2015), arXiv:1411.1816] "Replica symmetry breaking in trajectories of a driven Brownian particle" and author reply [arXiv:1805.10474]
The comment is intended to answer the criticism presented on `Steady-state fluctuations of a genetic feedback loop: an exact solution' [J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 137}, 035104 (2012).] and provides the missing component for the complete analytic…
Experiments show evidence for stripe formation in the underdoped cuprates. Here we discuss recent numerical calculations on the t-J model which tell us about the mechanism responsible for stripe formation and the relationship between…
This paper replies the comment by E. Kapuscik [Am. J. Phys. 77, 754 (2009)]
We comment on recent e-print by L. Mardoyan et al. [cond-mat/0609768]
We comment on the Reply of G. Su and M. Suzuki [cond-mat/9808011] to our Comment [cond-mat/9807402] about the papers of G. Su [Phys. Rev. B 54, 8291 (1996)] and G. Su and M. Suzuki [Phys. Rev. B 57, 13367 (1998)]. The algebraic mistake…
We argue that our analysis of the J-Q model, presented in Phys. Rev. B 80, 174403 (2009), and based on a field-theory description of coupled dimers, captures properly the strong quantum fluctuations tendencies, and the objections outlined…
This is a reply to the comment to a letter by D. Mandal, K. Klymko and M. R. DeWeese published as Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 258001 (2017).
This reply tries to rectify some misunderstandings that are in our opinion contained in the Comment by Campostrini and Rossi, <hep-lat 99407008> on our paper <hep-lat 9407003>.
Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.