Related papers: Comment on ``Stripes and the t-J Model''
This is a comment on Chen et al Letter PRL,100, 232002 (2008).
This is a comment on J. Schmittbuhl, A. Hansen, and G. G. Batrouni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 045505 (2003). They offer a reply, in turn.
Recently K. Banaszek, I. A. Walmsley, K. Wodkiewicz (quant-ph/0012097) commented on our Proposal for the Measurement of Bell-Type Correlations from Continuous Variables [T. C. Ralph, W. J. Munro, R. E. S. Polkinghorne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85,…
Authors' Reply to the Comment by Janossy et al. [cond-mat/0005275] on our article, "Magnetoresistance Anomalies in Antiferromagnetic YBa_{2}Cu_{3}O_{6+x}: Fingerprints of Charged Stripes" [cond-mat/9905071, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2813…
The hole-doped standard and extended t-J models on ladders with anisotropic Heisenberg interactions are studied computationally in the interval $0.0 \leq \lambda \leq 1.0$ ($\lambda=0$, Ising; $\lambda=1$, Heisenberg). It is shown that the…
In this Comment we discuss some points concerning the modeling of parked cars proposed in the article by Rawal and Rodgers, Physica A (2005). We also introduce another approach to this problem which leads to a better description of the…
A Comment on the Letter by D. Hemanth Kumar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 144301 (2004)
This is a comment on the paper arXiv:1410.2840 by Ji and Jin, to appear in the AOAS.
After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…
This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, hep-ph/0701081
Critiques presented by P. Grassberger in Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 140601 (2005) are addressed.
A comment to the paper by S. Chen, H. B\"uttner, and J. Voit, [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 087205 (2001)].
Comment on K.J Thomas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 135-138 (1996).
Two recent articles by Norman H. March that contain misleading statements concerning 3D Ising models, partly based on earlier erroneous work of Z.D. Zhang, are addressed.
The Comment by Xiong et al. (arXiv:1610.06275) criticizing my Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 133903 (2016)] was rejected by Physical Review Letters. In this Reply, I show that all their claims are wrong.
A comment on the paper "Truncated Schwinger-Dyson Equations and Gauge Covariance in QED3", Few-Body Syst. 41, 185 (2007) [hep-ph/0511291].
In a recent paper, Vink et al. analyzed some spectropolarimetry data of O-type stars. Here we comment on our disagreement with some points presented in this paper, with the hope of helping to fully grasp the scientific implication of these…
Comment on Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2086 (2001)
Structural distortions in cuprate materials give a natural origin for anisotropies in electron properties. We study a modified one-band t-J model in which we allow for different hoppings and antiferromagnetic couplings in the two spatial…
This note contains my response to the comment written by J. Franklin on my paper ``Covariant formulation of electrodynamics in isotropic media''.