Related papers: Reply to "Comment on `Non-universal exponents in i…
Comment in response to Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 046401 (2014)
We provide a quantitative picture of non-conserved interface growth from a diffusive field making special emphasis on two main issues, the range of validity of the effective small-slopes (interfacial) theories and the interplay between the…
We present an alternative finite-size approach to a set of parity conserving interfaces involving attachment, dissociation, and detachment of extended objects in 1+1 dimensions. With the aid of a nonlocal construct introduced by Barma and…
A recent e-print (cond-mat/0604532) presented a proposed Comment to Applied Physics Letters on our publication Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 162503 (2006), cond-mat/0603260. Here is our Response. As the proposed Comment has now been rejected by…
The article is an reply to comments on the paper [H. Watanabe, S. Yukawa, N. Ito, and C.-K. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 93, 19601 (2004)] by G. Pruessner and N. R. Moloney published in [Phys. Rev. Lett. vo. 95, 258901 (2005)]. In this reply,…
We respond to the criticisms of a recent paper of Buchert et al. [arXiv:1505.07800]
We have reviewed the comment in [3], posted on arXiv.org concerning our recent work in [1]. We reply to the comment in this paper.
We reply to David's comment (hep-lat/9504017) on our paper Phys.Rev.Lett. 74(1995)1920.
In this paper we prove that solutions to a transmission problem degenerating on the interface are H\"older differentiable up to the interface with universal estimates. Furthermore, we obtain a sharper pointwise $C^{1,\alpha(\cdot)}$ with…
We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, 087001 (2022), raised by Th\'eo S\'epulcre, Serge Florens, and Izak Snyman in arXiv:2210.00742.
Comment on ``Tests of scaling and universality of the distributions of trade size and share volume: Evidence from three distinct markets" by Plerou and Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 76, 046109 (2007)
We regret that PRL did not accept our Reply for publication. We believe that both our Reply and the original paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 135901 (2017)) is sound and correct. We post our reply here and let readers to judge.
These notes contain results concerning uniform exponential growth which were obtained in collaborations with E. Breuillard and A. Salehi-Golsefidy, mostly during 2005, improving Eskin-Mozes-Oh theorem \cite{EMO}, as well as a uniform…
This is a comment published in Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 73, page 1051 (1994).
A reply to the comment by Lee et al. [arXiv:1309.5367]
Discussion of "Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes" by A. C. Davison, S. A. Padoan and M. Ribatet [arXiv:1208.3378].
Comment on "Time Step Sensitivity of Nonlinear Atmospheric Models: Numerical Convergence, Truncation Error Growth, and Ensemble Design" Teixeira et al.
We reply to L.P. Grishchuk's comment (gr-qc/9801011) on our paper ``The Influence of Cosmological Transitions on the Evolution of Density Perturbations'' (Phys. Rev. D 57, 3302, 1998). We show that his points of criticism are not correct.
This comment is devoted to the paper "Exact solutions of nonlinear diffusion-convection-reaction equation: A Lie symmetry approach" (CNSNS, vol. 67 (2019), 253-263) in which several results are not new because were derived much earlier.…
A Comment on the Letter by Granger et.al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 135506 (2002).