Related papers: Reply to Wang's comment
The paper has been withdrawn for further elaboration.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author. This paper is now obsolete. For a solution please see: arXiv:/1205.4265.
A recent Comment [arXiv:0811.2790] on the Letter 'Quantum Bounce and Cosmic Recall' by the authors is shown to arise from an incorrect understanding of the issues at hand and of our analysis. The conclusions of Bojowald's Comment are shown…
This paper has been withdrawn and no version of it will ever be published.
This paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author.
This paper has been withdrawn.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to unhappy mistake in the initial scope of the work.
We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors; its contents are superseded by that of hep-th/0105305 and hep-th/0212275.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.
The paper was removed.
The paper has bene withdrawn by the author.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author.
This paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author because the conclusions reached in it are incorrect.
This paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn
This paper was withdrawn by arXiv admins because of inappropriate and unverifiable claims of appropriation.