Related papers: Reply to the comment by D.N. Aristov and A.G. Yash…

We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).

Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.

A short Reply to the Comment of Prokof'ev and Svistunov, cond-mat/0504008, is given.

This is a reply to a comment of Casati, Chirikov and Zhirov (PRL 85, 896 (2000)) on PRL 83, 5419 (1999). The suitability of the particlar two-time boundary value problem used in the earlier PRL is argued.

We deconstruct and address a comment to Carroll et al. [Phys Rev Lett 126, 063902 (2021)] (PRL) that has been posted on arXiv appearing as two versions [arXiv:2106.15242v1] and [arXiv:2106.15242v2]. This comment claimed that a term in the…

We reply to a comment by Averin and Korotkov http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0404549 on Stace and Barrett, PRL 92, 136802 (2004) http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v92/e136802, showing that their specific criticisms are unfounded, and…

This is a comment on the PRL: Gravitational mass $M$ carried by sound waves by A. Esposito, R. Krichevsky and A. Nicolis, Phys.Rev. Lett. {\bf 122}, 084501 (2019).

We provide a reply to a comment by I. Goychuk arXiv:1501.06996 [cond-mat.stat-mech] (not under active consideration with Phys. Rev. Lett.) on our Letter A. Rebenshtok, S. Denisov, P. H\"anggi, and E. Barkai, {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf…

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

Results of a 2012 PRL Letter have recently been questioned by T. Kalaydzhyan in arXiv:1604.04486. Here we confirm our original results and conclusions by addressing all concerns raised in the Comment.

We reply to comment on recent paper by Pieplow and Henkel (New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 023027) and our results made by Volokitin and Persson (arXiv: 1405.2525)

In this communication we refute a criticism concerning results of our work [3] that was presented in references [1] and [2].

After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…

Comment on cond-mat/0205390; PRL 90, 026805 (2003)

This is a comment on the article "Integrable Systems in Stringy Gravity" by D. V. Gal'tsov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2863, (1995).

We regret that PRL did not accept our Reply for publication. We believe that both our Reply and the original paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 135901 (2017)) is sound and correct. We post our reply here and let readers to judge.

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

Answer to the comment of E. Chudnovsky concerning the following papers: (1) N.V. Prokof'ev, P.C.E. Stamp, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5794 (1998). (2) W. Wernsdorfer, T. Ohm, C. Sangregorio, R. Sessoli, D. Mailly, C. Paulsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82,…

This is a Comment on "Vortex Liquid Crystal in Anisotropic Type II Superconductors" by E. W. Carlson et al. in PRL, vol.90, 087001 (2003) [cond-mat/0209175].

We reply to the comment arXiv:quant-ph/0702060 on our letter arXiv:quant-ph/0603120 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100402 (2006)]