Related papers: Comment on ``Random-Field Spin Model beyond 1 Loop…

In the previous paper [arXiv:2210.10435], the nonlinear perturbation theory of cosmological density field is generalized to include the tensor-valued bias of astronomical objects, such as spins and shapes of galaxies and any other tensors…

Electromagnetic corrections to the low-energy pi+ pi- -> pi0 pi0 scattering amplitude at next-to-leading order in the chiral expansion are reviewed. Their effects on the corresponding scattering lengths are estimated and compared to the…

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

According to Pruessner and Peters [Phys. Rev. E {\bf 73}, 025106(R) (2006)], the finite size scaling exponents of the order parameter in sandpile models depend on the tuning of driving and dissipation rates with system size. We point out…

A point-by-point answer to the comment authored by S. Ayik and D. Lacroix is presented. At this point in time this text is not aimed at being submitted to Phys. Rev. C or any other journal, unless the authors of the comment choose to follow…

Comment on ``Boosting Algorithms: Regularization, Prediction and Model Fitting'' [arXiv:0804.2752]

This is a comment on a paper by Glendenning, Pei, and Weber (Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 1603, 1997), where the authors gave an incorrect estimate of the event rate and neglected the important gravitational energy release. Previous work on the…

A Comment on the Letter by O. Viehmann, J. von Delft, and F. Marquardt [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 107}, 113602 (2011)].

Letter to the Editor: Some comments on "On construction of the smallest one-sided confidence interval for the difference of two proportions" by Weizhen Wang [arXiv:1002.4945].

This combines a reply to the Comment [hep-th/0203067 v1] by A. N. Vaidya and R. de L. Rodrigues with an erratum to our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 210405 (2001)]

In a recent paper Robicheaux and Shaw [Phys. Rev. A 58, 1043 (1998)] calculate the recurrence spectra of atoms in electric fields with non-vanishing angular momentum <L_z> not equal to 0. Features are observed at scaled actions ``an order…

We explain why the analysis in our paper [Phys. Rev. D 69, 064033 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0311064 ] is relevant and correct.

I criticize the claim, made in a recent article [C. M. Bender and L. R. Mead, Eur. J. Phys. 20, 117 (1999)], that in order to obtain the correct cross section for the scattering from a two-dimensional delta-function potential one must…