Related papers: Comment on "Spinon Attraction in Spin-1/2 Antiferr…

Comments on the article "Pulsar dynamics: magnetic dipole model revisited".

In this comment, we emphasize that the self-consistent spin wave theory in a recent paper [J. K"onig, H.-H. Lin, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5628 (2000)] leads to incorrect results both at low temperatures and near T_c. Thus…

Chapter published in, "The Physics of Superconductors," Vol II, edited by Bennemann and Ketterson, Springer-Verlag, 2004.

This is a reply to the comment by O. Narikiyo (cond-mat/0012505) on our paper J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 68}, (1999) 1614. We point out mistakes about his arguments, and we show that our analysis is compatible with the established Fermi liquid…

In the context of the $S=1$ kagome antiferromagnet Na$_2$Ti$_3$Cl$_8$, we respond to the comment by Khomskii et al. [D.I. Khomskii, T. Mizokawa and S.V. Streltsov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 049701 (2021)] on previous work by Paul et al. [A.…

This paper is Comment to the Letter "Oscillatory Spin-Filtering due to Gate Control of Spin-Dependent Interface Conductance", by D. Grundler (PRL 86, 1058 (2001)).

The properties of the groundstate and first excitations of 2dimensionnal quantum antiferromagnets are rapidly sketched. A special emphasis is put on the gapped phases: Valence Bond Crystals and the two types of Spin Liquids. New results on…

Comment on O. Gendelman, Y. G. Pollack, I. Procaccia, S. Sengupta, and J. Zylberg, Physical Review Letters 116, 078001 (2016).

I give a comment on arXiv:1802.01804v3 [hep-ph]

We reply to the criticism raised by Volovik in his Comment (cond-mat/9805159) and by Hirschfeld et al. in their Comment (cond-mat/9806085).

Using the Jordan-Wigner fermionization, Green function approach and continued fractions we examine rigorously the local magnetizations and the local static susceptibilities of the spin-1/2 XX chain in a transverse field with regularly…

A Comment on the Letter by O. Viehmann, J. von Delft, and F. Marquardt [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 107}, 113602 (2011)].

We respond to the comment of Bramwell et al (arXiv:1111.4168v1) to our original publication (S. R. Dunsiger et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 207207 (2011)), detailing muon spin rotation measurements of the Spin Ice compound Dy2Ti2O7.

As a coauthor of the article mentioned in the title, I discuss the criticism in the comment of Aalseth et al. Part of the criticism is justified.

Comment on the paper by K. E. Nagaev, S. V. Remizov, D. S. Shapiro, Noise in the helical edge channel anisotropically coupled to a local spin, JETP Lett. 108, 664 (2018).

We consider the effects of interactions on the nature of spinon excitations in Heisenberg spin-1/2 chains. We explicitly compute the two-spinon part of the longitudinal structure factor of the infinite chain in zero field for all values of…

A reply on the comment of Bertin, Chate, Ginelli, Gregoire, Leonard and Peshkov, arxiv:1404.3950v1, in this special issue.

Comment on S.-Q. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 187203 (2005) [cond-mat/0506676]. We show that the equations of motion deduced by Shen are incorrect and derive semiclassical expression for the operator of force, which also contains a term of…

This is a supplementary material to our Comment arXiv:0909.4265 on M. Stern, V. Garmider, E. Segre, M. Rappaport, V. Umansky, Y. Levinson, and I. Bar-Joseph, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 257402 (2008).

This note points out that the assertions of [1] are groundless and incorrect.