Related papers: Comment on "Gapless Spin-1 Neutral Collective Mode…

Reply to `Comment on "Gapless Spin-1 Neutral Collective Mode Branch for Graphite"' by Peres et al [cond-mat/0312263].

Using the standard tight binding model of 2d graphite with short range electron repulsion, we find a gapless spin-1, neutral collective mode branch {\em below the particle-hole continuum} with energy vanishing linearly with momenta at the…

Using tight binding band picture for 2D graphite, and the Hubbard interaction, recently we obtained a gapless, neutral spin-1 collective mode in graphite \cite{SZS}. In this paper we present a detailed RPA analysis of the Neutron Scattering…

A comment on the paper Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 161116 (2014).

A comment to the paper by S. Chen, H. B\"uttner, and J. Voit, [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 087205 (2001)].

Comment on the paper P. E. Jonsson, H. Yoshino, and P. Nordblad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097201 (2002), also cond-mat/0203444.

We comment on the latest paper [K.-H. Ding, Z.-G. Zhu, and J. Berakdar, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 266003 (2012)].

Reply to the Comment by L. Berthier and J.-P. Bouchaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 059701 (2003), also cond-mat/0209165, on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097201 (2002), also cond-mat/0203444

A comment on the paper by Lopez et al. [A. Lopez, Z. Z. Sun, and J. Schliemann, Phys. Rev. B 85, 205428 (2012)].

In this comment we discuss some serious inconsistencies presented by Gomes, Malacarne and da Silva in their paper, Phys.Rev. D60 (1999) 125016 (hep-th/9908181).

This paper is Comment to the Letter "Oscillatory Spin-Filtering due to Gate Control of Spin-Dependent Interface Conductance", by D. Grundler (PRL 86, 1058 (2001)).

This is a comment on J. Schmittbuhl, A. Hansen, and G. G. Batrouni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 045505 (2003). They offer a reply, in turn.

A Comment on the Letter by Atsushi Ikeda and Kunimasa Miyazaki, [arXiv:1003.5472v2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 255704 (2010)].

This is a reply to the Comment on 'Spin Decoherence in Superconducting Atom Chips' [arXiv:quant-ph/0610095 (2006)].

This paper has inappropriate amounts of overlap with the following papers also written by the authors or their collaborators: gr-qc/0502059, gr-qc/0502061, gr-qc/0207026, and others.

Comment on B.A. Bernevig, D. Giuliano, and R.B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3392 (2001).

A comment on a recent paper (PRL {\bf 94}, 226405 (2005)) by S. De Palo, M. Botti, S. Moroni, and Gaetano Senatore.

Arising from the Article: Nature Phys. 2, 620-625 (2006), By M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim.

This is a Reply to the Comment of S.R. White and D.J. Scalapino [cond-mat/9907243] on our recent paper ``Stripes and the t-J Model'' [Physical Review Letters 83, 132 (1999) and cond-mat/9812022].

We respond to the comment arXiv:1809.03931 put forward by Li-Han Chen, Zhen Liu, and Jian-Tin Zheng on our work Kiesel, Platt, and Thomale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 126405 (2013). All misunderstandings and misconceptions communicated in the…