Related papers: Reply to the Comment physics/0307134 by A. Helmste…
Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).
Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564
We provide our reply to the comment by Greiter and Schuricht (cond-mat/0511607).
Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.
Response to Comment by A. Bussmann-Holder (arXiv:0909.3603)
This is a comment on Phys. Rev. A 67, 022104(2003).
It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical…
This reply contains a brief response to the comment by R. Howl, D. R\"atzel, and I. Fuentes [arXiv:1811.10306]
Benenti et al. recently submitted a Comment (arXiv:0912.3667) on our work "Coherent Ratchets in Driven Bose-Einstein condensates". We show that the main claim of the Comment is wrong, and correct some other misunderstandings presented…
This is a reply to a Comment on 'A test-tube model for rainfall', {\it Europhys. Lett.}, {\bf 106}, 40001, (2014).
Reply to the preceding comment by Rolf Schilling and Bernhard Schmid [arXiv:1101.5577, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 049601 (2011)].
This combines a reply to the Comment [hep-th/0203067 v1] by A. N. Vaidya and R. de L. Rodrigues with an erratum to our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 210405 (2001)]
This is the reply to a Comment by R. F. O'Connell (Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 028901) on a paper written by the author (B. Vacchini, ``Completely positive quantum dissipation'', Phys.Rev.Lett. 84 (2000) 1374, arXiv:quant-ph/0002094).
This is a reply to the comment to a letter by D. Mandal, K. Klymko and M. R. DeWeese published as Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 258001 (2017).
This is a reply to a comment by P. Schlottmann and A.A. Zvyagin.
This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, hep-ph/0701081
This is a comment on Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 180403 (2007) [arXiv:0704.2162].
A Comment on the Letter by C. R. Galley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 174301 (2013).
We reply to a recent comment by Bhattacharya et. al. (cond-mat/9812290) on our previous Letter (PRL 81, 5640 (1998)).
Here we give our reply to the comment by Sibirtsev et al on our paper ``Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of the N*(1535)".