Related papers: Reply to "Common on `Superfluidity in the interior…
Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564
In this work, we demonstrate the inappropriateness of the Boltzmann-Gibbs log-formulation of the physical Clausius entropy $S$ in connecting thermodynamics and phase space statistics. To achieve our goal, we study thermodynamically the…
It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical…
We point out that an erroneous derivation in the recent paper [Fetecau et al., Nonlinear Anal. RWA 12 (2011) 1] yields a correct solution by accident. Additionally, a number of misrepresentations and inaccuracies in the latter recent paper…
In their recent paper [Phys. Rev. E 99 (2019) 032134], T. Oikinomou and B. Bagci have argued that R\'enyi entropy is ill-suited for inference purposes because it is not consistent with the Shore{ Johnson axioms of statistical estimation…
We respond to the comment arXiv:1809.03931 put forward by Li-Han Chen, Zhen Liu, and Jian-Tin Zheng on our work Kiesel, Platt, and Thomale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 126405 (2013). All misunderstandings and misconceptions communicated in the…
We demonstrate that criticisms concerning our work nucl-th/9704043, made in the recent preprint hep-ph/9903352, are unfounded. The improvements over our results claimed in hep-ph/9903352 are in fact spurious, being based mainly on…
In this note, we demonstrate that an incorrect statement has been propagated in multiple papers, stemming from the substitution of ``lim'' with ``limsup'' for a sequence in Lemma 1.3 of the paper [J. Schu: Weak and strong convergence to…
The well-known Lagrangian of current superfluid systems is not relativistic covariant, this paper gives a general relativistic covariant Lagrangian of superfluid systems, and naturally finds the non-relativistic Lagrangian and its all…
This is a Reply to the Comment (cond-mat/9812331) by Kravchenko et al. on our earlier work (cond-mat/9812216).
In this thesis we investigate the instabilities of superfluids at finite superflow by means of a hydrodynamical approach. We find that at a finite value of the background superfluid velocity a hydrodynamic collective mode crosses to the…
In this correspondence, it is given a correction to Theorem 4 in Y. Hu, and G. Xiao, "Generalized Self-Shrinking Generator," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 714-719, April 2004.
We comment on a work by T. Liverpool (Phys. Rev. E 101 (2020)). We show that a theorem stated in that work is not correct. While this is inconsequential to the bulk of the work (and holds asymptotically as we show), it is instructive to…
In a recent numerical investigation of the Coulomb glass, Surer et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 067205 (2009)] concluded that their simulation results are consistent with the Efros Shklovskii prediction for the density of states in the…
We provide here a counter-example to the second inequality of Corollary (19.10) in the Clay Institute Monograph by J.Morgan and G.Tian entitled "Ricci Flow and the Poincare Conjecture". We had announced the existence of this counter-example…
It is shown that the recent Comment [cond-mat/0306019] by Y. Yu on the above article is not substantiated.
We analyze the scepticism on the hydrodynamic turbulence in Keplerian astrophysical disks expressed in Balbus and Hawley 2006 and show the failure of arguments of the paper.
The recent Comment by Vorontsov [arXiv:2007.13696] claims that surface pair-density-wave superconductivity with critical temperature higher than the bulk FFLO critical temperature is not supported by microscopic theory. The conclusion is…
The Comments are devoted to the recently published paper 'Modelling and nonclassical symmetry analysis of a complex porous media flow in a dilating channel' (Physica D. 481 (2025) 134834), in which a model describing an unsteady…
The preceding Comment by Xu et al. (Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 059803 (2019); arXiv:1808.05390) erroneously applies the entropic stress expression in our Letter (T.C. O'Connor et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 047801 (2018); arXiv:1806.09509) to…