Related papers: Reply to "Common on `Superfluidity in the interior…
We make remarks on Ristroph and Zhang's [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 101}, 194502 (2008)] paper. We argue especially that due to the interferences the calibration procedures in [1] were not complete and this will induce some measurements'…
The article in \cite{HolmlidAIPA2016} has recently come to our attention. It makes a number of extraordinary claims that each contradict well established facts in several fields, ranging from atomic and molecular physics to…
In this paper we show that the claims in [Class. Quantum Grav. 19 (2002) 3067, gr-qc/0203081] related to our analysis in [Phys. Rev. D 62, 063508 (2000), astro-ph/0005070] are wrong.
In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).
This is a Comment to the paper by Galitski and Larkin in Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 087001 (cond-mat/0104247). It is pointed out that their argument that the quantumn glass transition field should be higher than the mean field H_{c2}(0) is…
In a recent Letter (Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1552 (1997) ), Zaikin, Golubev, van Otterlo, and Zimanyi criticized the phenomenological time-dependent Ginzburg-Laudau model which I used to study the quantum phase-slippage rate for superconducting…
We study Minkowski supersymmetric flux vacua of type II string theory. Based on the work by M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini and A. Tomasiello, we briefly explain how to reformulate things in terms of Generalized Complex Geometry, which…
Withdrawn. We thank J. T. Liu for bringing an error in the manuscript to our attention.
The paper contains a fundamental defect in its framework of using the gauge action to study the rigidity problem. As a result, the calculations leading to the main formula is also incorrect.
Comment on PRL v. 86, p. 5084 (2001) [cond-mat/0101016]. We point out that the authors' simulations are consistent with the known theory of steady-state solutions in this system.
In a recent preprint by Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, Unanyan, Fleischhauer and Sirker [arxiv:2203.06689] the authors comment on our work which studied the number entropy in strongly disordered systems. The data presented in the comment does not…
In response to the comment by Zhu and Berakdar (arXiv:1207.3457) that the physical system considered by them in their previous work [Ding et al., PRB 84, 115433 (2011)] is conceptually different from ours in the appendix of our latest paper…
We refute all claims of the "Comment on "Normalization of quasinormal modes in leaky optical cavities and plasmonic resonators" " by E. A. Muljarov and W. Langbein (arXiv:1602.07278v1). Based entirely on information already contained in our…
We respond to a Comment [arXiv:1407.6854 (2014)] on our recent Nature paper [Nature, 510, 385 (2014)]. We categorically disprove the arguments provided in arXiv:1407.6854 (2014) and thereby further substantiate the evidence we presented in…
Comment on "Liquids on Topologically Nanopatterned Surfaces" by O. Gang et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 217801 (2005). See also an erratum published by O. Gang et al (Phys Rev Lett, to appear)
We clarify the basic faults in Fang, A.; Mi, Y. Drainage of a Thin Liquid Film between Hydrophobic Spheres: Boundary Curvature Effects. Langmuir 2014, 30, 83-89, which led to unphysical conclusions.
We show that arguments in the comment by Schwab et al. quant-ph/0503018 on our recent work are invalid.
It is shown that the claims expressed in the Comment arXiv:0810.3247v1 against my paper Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 101}, 163603 (2008) [arXiv:0809.3901] are obviously wrong or not essential.
After carefully studying the comment by Wang et al. (arXiv:1408.6420), we found it includes several mistakes and unjustified statements and Wang et al. lack very basic knowledge of dislocations. Moreover, there is clear evidence indicating…
In a recent Letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4200 (1998)) Park and Jain presented results of gap calculations for polarized states at \nu=1/3, 2/5, 3/7 and 4/9. They computed the effects on the gaps due the finite width of the interfacial wave…