Related papers: Comment on ""Proximity effect in ultrafin Pb/Ag mu…
We comment on a letter publised in PRL by: D. Coffey and L. Coffey, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 70}, 1529 (1993) where it is claimed that the dip structure above the gap is evidence for d-wave pairing. We show that the analysis in this letter is…
In this communication we refute a criticism concerning results of our work [3] that was presented in references [1] and [2].
In this comment we point out that the experimental evidence for superconductivity presented by Thapa and Pandey in arXiv:1807.08572 is also consistent with a percolation transition. We propose simple follow-up experiments which would help…
We demonstrate that criticisms concerning our work nucl-th/9704043, made in the recent preprint hep-ph/9903352, are unfounded. The improvements over our results claimed in hep-ph/9903352 are in fact spurious, being based mainly on…
We comment on a recent work by Burgy, Moreo, and Dagotto, Phys. Rev. Lett. V.92, 097202 (2004) (cond-mat/0308456).
The authors of a recent paper, "Ultrahigh-Energy Neutrino-Nucleon Deep-Inelastic Scattering and the Froissart Bound", A. Illarianov, B. Kniehl and A. Kotikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 231802 (2011), derive an approximate formula for the UHE…
Recently S.Galam and A.Mauger [Phys.Rev.E 56, 322 (1997); cond-mat/9706304 ] proposed an approximant which relates the bond and the site percolation threshold for a particular lattice. Their formula is based on a fit to exact and simulation…
In a recent paper \cite{benayoun} M.Benayoun {\it et al.} use a specific model to compare results on the existing data for the cross section of the process $e^+e^-\rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-$ and state conclusions about the inconsistency of the…
We make a couple of remarks on ``Comments'' due to A. Moroz which were addressed to our recent letter "Differential cross section for Aharonov-Bohm effect with non standard boundary conditions", Europhys. Lett. 44 (1998) 403.
In this note we show that a sharp rigidity estimate and a sharp Korn's inequality for matrix-valued fields whose incompatibility is a bounded measure can be obtained as a consequence of a Hodge decomposition with critical integrability due…
A critique to the article by C.A. Fuchs, N.D. Mermin, and R.Schack, "An introduction to QBism with and application to the locality of quantum mechanics" that appeared in Am. J. Phys. 82 (8), 749-754 (2014)
We show in this comment that the results obtained in a recent work by Yi et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 150406 (2004)] are quantitatively not correct and the proposed subsystem Berry phase is not well-defined.
Our recent letter "Cosmic Microwave Background Constraints Cast a Shadow On Continuous Spontaneous Localization Models" [arXiv:1906.04405] has recently been criticised in [G. R. Bengochea, G. Leon, P. Pearle, and D. Sudarsky,…
We show that the recent reinterpretation of oxygen isotope effects in cuprate superconductors by D. R. Harshman et al. is mathematically and physically incorrect violating the Anderson theorem and the Coulomb law.
The author of article discusses the possible systematic effects in our experiment using reference and picture from allegedly our publication. First of all this publication does not exist. The assumption of author about the probability of…
We provide a reply to a comment by I. Goychuk arXiv:1501.06996 [cond-mat.stat-mech] (not under active consideration with Phys. Rev. Lett.) on our Letter A. Rebenshtok, S. Denisov, P. H\"anggi, and E. Barkai, {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf…
We comment on the paper `UCN anomalous losses and the UCN capture cross section on material defects' by A. Serebrov et al., Phys. Lett. A 335 (2005) 327 - 336. Data presented do not originate from these authors alone but were taken in…
It is shown that the work by Farago and Gradzielski [J. Chem. Phys. 114, 10105 (2001)] is based on incorrect expressions for the scattering functions, contains a number of other serious defects, and should be revised.
In the recently posted arXiv:2312.04495v3 [1], its authors used a computer code written by me supplied to them by the authors of Ref. [2], and claimed that the results that they obtained invalidate the results and conclusions presented in…
We show that the experimental evidence presented in this paper is insufficient to support its conclusions.