Related papers: Reply to a Comment

We reply to the preceding Comment by E. van Beveren et al., arXiv:0811.2589 [hep-ph].

This is a reply to the paper by S.C.Benjamin, quant-ph/0008127.

Comment on [math.ST/0612817]

A Comment on the Letter by Victor Gurarie and Alexander E. Lobkovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 178301 (2002). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

We reply to the comment cond-mat/0008098 by Yang, Sun, and Chang on our paper "Theory of Diluted Magnetic Semiconductor Ferromagnetism", Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5628 (2000).

A Comment on the Letter by C. R. Galley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 174301 (2013).

This is a reply to the comment by Gilbert and Sanders [arXiv:1111.6271 (2011)]. We point out that their comment is a follow-up of a previous discussion which we briefly summarize before we refute their new criticism.

We make several comments on "Note on the Analytical Solution of the Rabi Model" (arXiv:1210.4946).

Reply to the "Discussion of "Estimating the Distribution of Dietary Consumption Patterns" by Raymond J. Carroll [arXiv:1405.4667]" by Stephen E. Fienberg and Rebecca C. Steorts [arXiv:1403.0566].

We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, 087001 (2022), raised by Th\'eo S\'epulcre, Serge Florens, and Izak Snyman in arXiv:2210.00742.

I respond to the Bernard et al. comment on my letter ``Chiral anomalies and rooted staggered fermions.''

We reply to the comment (cond-mat/9806125) by Essler, Goehmann and Korepin, and show that their points are unfounded.

We make corrections on the paper by Sugino [{\it JHEP} {\bf 0501} (2005) 016].

A reply to arXiv:0809.2310, "Comment on Universal Charge-Radius Relation for Subatomic and Astrophysical Compact Objects" [arXiv:0804.2140,PRL100(2008)151102]

Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]

Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]

Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]

A comment on the preprint "Towards a quantitative kinetic theory of polar active matter" by T. Ihle, arXiv:1401.8056.

This is a short communication in reference to the comments in (arXiv: 1605.05147) of our paper in Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25, 1650051 (2016). We have tried to answer to the comments or criticism in the paper.

The reply by Oughstun et al. [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28, 468-469 (2011)] to our comment [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28, 450-452 (2011)] on their recently published paper [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, 1664-1670 (2010)] is shown to make no response to the main…