Related papers: Reply to a Comment

Reply to the Comment physics/0307134 by A. Helmstetter and D. Sornette

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

We provide our reply to the comment by Greiter and Schuricht (cond-mat/0511607).

Response to Comment by A. Bussmann-Holder (arXiv:0909.3603)

Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin: cond-mat/0410147

This is a reply to a comment by P. Schlottmann and A.A. Zvyagin.

A short Reply to the Comment of Prokof'ev and Svistunov, cond-mat/0504008, is given.

We remark on the validity of the concerns raised in the comment(cond-mat/0304626) by Fal'ko, Lerner, Tsyplyatyev, and Aleiner..

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].

Remarks on reply (cond-mat/0206368) to Johansen's comment (cond-mat/0205249)

This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, hep-ph/0701081

We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).

Here we give our reply to the comment by Sibirtsev et al on our paper ``Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of the N*(1535)".

Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.

A reply on the comment of Bertin, Chate, Ginelli, Gregoire, Leonard and Peshkov, arxiv:1404.3950v1, in this special issue.

This reply tries to rectify some misunderstandings that are in our opinion contained in the Comment by Campostrini and Rossi, <hep-lat 99407008> on our paper <hep-lat 9407003>.

We regret to point out several inaccurate and misleading statements that Benedetto {\em et al.} make in their Reply to our Comment on their paper titled ``Language Trees and Zipping''.

Reply to the comment, cond-mat/0209398 by by N.W. Watkins, S.C. Chapman, and G. Rowlands

A reply to the comment by S. Friedemann et al. [arXiv:1207.0536] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].