Related papers: Comment on "Phase Diagram of an Asymmetric Spin La…

Comment on the paper Schiavoni et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 094101 (2003).

Reply to the Comment by L. Berthier and J.-P. Bouchaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 059701 (2003), also cond-mat/0209165, on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097201 (2002), also cond-mat/0203444

In the paper [Hong-Shi Zong, Wei-Min Sun, Phys. Lett. B 640 (2006) 196], the authors claim that our proof of the inconsistency of the ladder approximation to QCD [Phys. Lett. B 611 (2005) 129] was incorrect. However, their claim is based on…

Comment on a recent paper published in Physical Review Letters by M. C. Wang, S. Qiao, Z. Jiang, S. N. Luo, and J. Qi [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 036601 (2016), arXiv:1511.02994v2].

Comment on K.J Thomas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 135-138 (1996).

Comment on the paper P. E. Jonsson, H. Yoshino, and P. Nordblad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097201 (2002), also cond-mat/0203444.

Comment on "Classifying Novel Phases of Spinor Atoms", Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 180412 (2006) by R. Barnett, A. Turner and E. Demler

This is a comment on Chen et al Letter PRL,100, 232002 (2008).

This is a Comment on the Article ``Aging, phase ordering and conformal invariance'' by M.Henkel, M.Pleimling, C.Godr\`eche and J.M.Luck [Phys.Rev.Lett. 87, 265701 (2001)].

Comments are made on some recently published papers on matter collineations of plane symmetric, cylindrically symmetric and spherically symmetric spacetimes.

Comment on B.A. Bernevig, D. Giuliano, and R.B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3392 (2001).

This paper is Comment on the paper: S.A.R. Horsley and M. Babiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010405 (2005).

This is a Comment on Phys.Rev.Lett. 100, 017001 (2008).

We make remarks on Ristroph and Zhang's [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} 101, 194502 (2008)] paper.

Comment on the Letter by W. Rantner and X-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. v.86, p.3871 (2001).

Comment on the Letter ``Polynomial-Time Simulation of Pairing Models on a Quantum Computer'', L. A. Wu, M. S. Byrd and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057904 (2002).

This is a reply to the comment by A. W. Sandvik (cond-mat/0010433) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4204 (2000). We show that his data do not conflict with our data nor with our conclusions.

Comment on "Gapless Spin-1 Neutral Collective Mode Branch for Graphite" by G. Baskaran and S.A. Jafari [cond-mat/0110022; Physical Review Letters, 89, 016402 (2002)].

A comment on the Letter by Le Doussal and Wiese, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 197202 (2006).

This is a short communication in reference to the comments in (arXiv: 1605.05147) of our paper in Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25, 1650051 (2016). We have tried to answer to the comments or criticism in the paper.