Related papers: Hong et al. reply to Walliser
We are pleased to see that Jeckelmann has made many changes to the original version of his comment on our paper as a result of our response. Here is a copy of this powerful response that reveals problems in his previous results. However,…
In an article entitled The Counterexample of a theorem in Wiener index of a fuzzy graph and application to illegal immigration networks, we have shown a few examples of incorrect proof of a theorem in the Wiener index. Now, in this article,…
Wang et al. [Science Advances, 1 Aug 2025 Vol 11, Issue 31] recently reported an experiment that they interpret as demonstrating a violation of Bell's inequality using unentangled photons. Such a claim is highly controversial, since it is…
In this work, we show that the proof of the main result in [An Application of Hayashi's Inequality for Differentiable Functions, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 32 (6) (1996), 95--99, by R.P. Agarwal and S.S. Dragomir] was wrong.…
Popper conceived an experiment whose analysis led to a result that he deemed absurd. Popper wrote that his reasoning was based on the Copenhagen interpretation and therefore invalidated the latter. Actually, Popper's argument involves…
The aim of this short note is to give counterexamples to two results by D. Y. Gao [5, Th. 16], [4, Th. 2] and to improve a related result by S.-C. Fang, D. Y. Gao, R.-L. Sheu and S.-Y. Wu [1, Th. 3].
The proofs of Theorem 3.1 and Corollary 4.1 in Le\~ao and Ohashi (2013) are incomplete. The reason is a wrong statement in Remark 2.2. The hypotheses and statements of Theorem 3.1 and Corollary 4.1 in Le\~ao and Ohashi (2013) remain…
It is pointed out that the "counter example" presented in the Comment is a family of probe wave functions which are increasingly broad as the shift becomes large. Furthermore, the author's variational calculation is not correct in the sense…
The claim in \cite{Al-Badawi:2025ipr} that *"the errors in the foundational components (3) and (5) of Ref. [1] invalidate all subsequent analyses, numerical results, and physical interpretations that depend on them"* is **entirely…
We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]
Two years ago, we alarmed the scientific community about the large number of bad papers in the literature on {\it zero difference balanced functions}, where direct proofs of seemingly new results are presented in an unnecessarily lengthy…
The inequality of Clauser and Horne [ Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974)], intended to overcome the limited scope of other inequalities to deterministic theories, is shown to have a resticted validity even in case of perfect detectors and perfect…
There is a serious mistake in the proof.
In response to M. Campisi's comment [arXiv: 1310.5556] on our recent work [Phys. Rev. E 88, 042126 (2013)], we first point out that the distribution used by Campisi is not the correct escort distribution and further provide arguments…
We fill in a gap in the proof of the main theorem in our earlier paper [Ol]. At the same time, we prove a slightly stronger version of the theorem needed for another paper.
The subjects of rook equivalence and Wilf equivalence have both attracted considerable attention over the last half-century. In this paper we introduce a new notion of Wilf equivalence for integer partitions, and, using this notion, we…
This paper has been withdrawn. See v1 still available to understand the problem: Proposition 2.2 is false. The error in the proof is in claim (3). Then, the whole paper collapses. We do not have any correction for now. We apologize to…
Across income groups and countries, individual citizens perceive economic inequality spectacularly wrong. These misperceptions have far-reaching consequences, as it is perceived inequality, not actualinequality informing redistributive…
In this paper, we give a new and short proof of a Theorem on k-hypertournament losing scores due to Zhou et al.[7].
This note discusses three examples given in the recent technical correspondence paper [1], which addresses the results presented in [2,3,4]. It is shown that the first example ([1], Section 3) is irrelevant to the results of [2]. The second…