Related papers: Paramagnetic Meissner effect in MgB2 superconducto…
The paper was withdrawn by the authors
This paper has been withdrawn
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. The parameterization of the FSR tensor has been not the most general.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors since it was strongly elaborated, some new sections appeared. This made the paper significantly differ from current version. Besides two new authors participated in the work. So the authors…
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial gap in the estimates for m>=4.
%auto-ignore This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s) because somebody do not agree with my idea.
This paper has been withdrawn due to non-clearness of some technical points, as well as lack of a reasonable statement of quantization conjecture.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to new results to be added.
This paper has been withdrawn, because the argument for generation of Goldstone modes is incorrect.
This paper was withdrawn by the author because severe errors were discovered.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to substantial changes.
This paper has been withdrawn.
Conventional superconductors respond to external magnetic fields by generating diamagnetic screening currents. However, theoretical work has shown that one can engineer systems where the screening current is paramagnetic, causing them to…
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to an error in the main theorem.
This paper has been withdrawn Abstract: This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the publication.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, since now all four parts of the review are available as a single file 0804.1639. I also made some revision of the text in order to avoid misprints and some inaccurate expressions.
This paper is withdrawn because the results in the paper are included in a paper to be published in Mathematical and Computer Modelling.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in equations 39 and 41.
This paper makes no sense. It only increases the entropy of our universe. It has been withdrawn by the author.