Related papers: Comment on 'Missing 2$k_F$ Response for Composite …

The response of composite Fermions to large wavevector scattering has been studied through phonon drag measurements. While the response retains qualitative features of the electron system at zero magnetic field, notable discrepancies…

Comment on the Letter by M. Franz and Z. Tesanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. v.87, p.257003 (2001).

This paper is a Comment on Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1516 (2000) by A.V. Uskov, A.-P. Jauho, B. Tromborg, J. Mork, and R. Lang.

Comment on B.A. Bernevig, D. Giuliano, and R.B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3392 (2001).

Comment on paper by A. Zvyagin, Phys. Rev. B 64, R060405 (2001).

Comment to D. Kaczorowski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 027003 (2009).

A reply to the comment by S. Friedemann et al. [arXiv:1207.0536] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].

We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, 087001 (2022), raised by Th\'eo S\'epulcre, Serge Florens, and Izak Snyman in arXiv:2210.00742.

A reply to the comment by V. R. Shaginyan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 279701 (2011), arXiv:1206.5372] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].

This is a Comment on Phys.Rev.Lett. 100, 017001 (2008).

A comment on PRL vol. 80, 4697 (1998) by Roder, Adler and Janke. Minior correction included.

We reply to the comment cond-mat/0008098 by Yang, Sun, and Chang on our paper "Theory of Diluted Magnetic Semiconductor Ferromagnetism", Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5628 (2000).

In this comment, I point out to several mathematical mistakes in the above-referenced letter.

Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.

Comment on "Spin Dynamics of the 2D Spin 1/2 Quantum Antiferromagnet Copper Deuteroformate Tetradeuterate (CFTD)", H. M. Ronnow et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037202 (2001)

This is a reply to the comment by A. W. Sandvik (cond-mat/0010433) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4204 (2000). We show that his data do not conflict with our data nor with our conclusions.

We reply to P. Forg\'acs, T. Herpay, and P. Kov\'acs (arXiv: 1202.6289).

This paper replies the comments by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 75, 844-845 (2007)] and V. Hnizdo [Am. J. Phys. 75, 845-846 (2007)].

We respond to `Comments on the U(2) ADHM two-instanton' [Y. Tian, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 183].

A Comment on the paper "Conservative Quantum Computing" by M. Ozawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057902 (2002). The author replies in Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 089802 (2003).