Related papers: The Cosmological Constant in Brane Cosmology
This paper has been removed by arXiv administrators because it plagiarizes hep-th/0308158, "Braneworld cosmological models with anisotropy," by A. Campos, R. Maartens, D. Matravers and C.F. Sopuerta; and gr-qc/0205028, "Gravitational Energy…
This paper is withdrawn by the author. See math.GT/9811093 for replacement.
This paper has been withdrawn by author due to an error in the proof.
This paper has been withdrawn due to the adherance to the double submission policies of a refereed journal. Our apologies.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due a crucial mistake in Lemma 2
This paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of [hep-ph/0609266].
Withdrawn by the author. Further research is needed.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author. A much more revised version is available as arXiv:0909.4238.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author because the arguments presented in the paper is incomplete.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to possible counter-examples.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to unspecified problems.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due an error in computing the invariance of the so(4,1) and so(3,2) "inner product."
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, since it has been merged with Part I (ID 0802.3570)
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to rewritting and skipping crucial sign errors.
We consider a model with two parallel (positive tension) 3-branes separated by a distance $L$ in 5-dimensional spacetime. If the interbrane space is anti-deSitter, or is not precisely anti-deSitter but contains no event horizons, the…
This paper has been removed by arXiv administrators because it plagiarizes gr-qc/0404032 and others.
Two approaches to the study of cosmological perturbations in the brane-world scenario are compared: the first uses the 5D equations directly whereas the second approach projects them onto the 4D brane and then uses the effective 4D…