Related papers: Comments on "Bigger Rip with no dark energy"
To appear in Phys. Rev. Lett. together with the author's Reply.
This article is the detailed version of a paper on dark matter, dark energy, and modified gravity, published in the December 2015-January 2016 special issue of "La Recherche" (in French)
The essential elements in my way of fitting the kappa reviewed. A number of incorrect claims made by Takamatsu are clarified and corrected.
Comment on paper "Towards a bulk theory of flexoelectricity" by R.Resta [Phys.Rew. Lett. v. 105, 127601 (2010)]
Comment on R. Planet, S. Santucci, J. Ortin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 094502 (2009) about the rescaling of the data and the data collapse. Reply to be found here.
The Comment by Duval et al. [PRL 96, 099701 (2006)] addresses an important, but not the main, result of our Letter [PRL 95, 137204 (2005)]. It does not contradict our results in substance, and the only objection is really on the style of…
We comment on a Letter by Vilar and Rubi [arXiv:0704.0761].
This paper replies the comments by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 75, 844-845 (2007)] and V. Hnizdo [Am. J. Phys. 75, 845-846 (2007)].
Models of the universe with arbitrary (non gravitational) interaction between the components of the cosmic fluid: the phantom energy and the background, are investigated. A general form of the interaction that is inspired in scalar-tensor…
The paper "Critical Truths About Power Laws" (Science, 335, pp665-666) by MPH Stumpf MPH and MA Porter is commented
In this paper we have investigated some rip cosmological models in an extended symmetric teleparallel gravity theory. We consider the form $f(Q,T)=aQ^m+bT$ in the Einstein-Hilbert action and expressed the field equations and the dynamical…
We provide a reply to a comment by I. Goychuk arXiv:1501.06996 [cond-mat.stat-mech] (not under active consideration with Phys. Rev. Lett.) on our Letter A. Rebenshtok, S. Denisov, P. H\"anggi, and E. Barkai, {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf…
We discuss how the comment by A. Loeb [arXiv:2408.06714] has no bearing on the results of Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 041401 (2024) [arXiv:2405.02389].
This is a Reply to a Comment by V.P. Torchigin and A.V. Torchigin, published in Physical Review A 92, 017803 (2015). The paper which is commented upon is titled "Deducing radiation pressure on a submerged mirror from the Doppler shift,"…
In this communication we refute a criticism concerning results of our work [3] that was presented in references [1] and [2].
We offer o reply for the comments of Rapisarda et al. cond-mat/0601409 on our letter "Entropy of Classical Systems with Long Range Interactios", published in Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol 95 (2005) 190601.
Nota bene: the numerical calculation underlying Version 1 of this reply and the original work Phys.Rev. C71:064903,2005 contains a basic numerical error (wrong factor in the self-energy formulas of Phys. Rev.C71:064903,2005). This renders…
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to numerical problems to get viable results.
We make some remarks on Berry's paper [{\it Eur. J. Phys.} 27 (2006) 109-118].
Ever since the first observations that we are living in an accelerating universe, it has been asked what dark energy is. There are various explanations all of which with have various draw backs or inconsistencies. Here we show that using a…