Related papers: Corrigendum for Hans Corrigendum
Some of my previous publications were incomplete in the sense that non trivial zeros belonging to a particular type of fundamental domain have been inadvertently ignored. Due to this fact, I was brought to believe that computations done by…
In this note, the correction to the proof of one theorem in some our previous paper [arXiv:1302.0589] will be given.
This paper has excessive overlap with the following papers also written by the authors or their collaborators: hep-th/0505013 and 0705.2930.
SE Han's paper [11] discusses several variants of digital covering maps. We show several equivalences among these variants and discuss shortcomings in Han's paper.
Here we give a reformulation of a key lemma in the paper [2], "Spaces of Topological Complexity One", which is necessary due to an oversight.
We continue the work of [5] and [3], in which are considered papers in the literature that discuss fixed point assertions in digital topology. We discuss published assertions that are incorrect or incorrectly proven; that are severely…
This is a corrigendum to Acta Math. 196 (2006) as well as to the follow-up publications JFA 259 (2010) and to JFA 260 (2011).
We correct a mistake in the paper "On the cuspidal cohomology of $S$-arithmetic subgroups of reductive groups over number fields " by A. Borel, J.-P. Labesse, J. Schwermer that appeared in Compositio Mathematica, 102 (1996), 1-40.
Several recent papers in digital topology have sought to obtain fixed point results by mimicking the use of tools from classical topology, such as complete metric spaces and homotopy invariant fixed point theory. We show that in many cases,…
This paper is a corrigendum to the article 'On the ideal theorem for number fields`. The main result of this paper proves to be untrue and is replaced by an estimate of a weighted sum with an improved error term.
This article corrects two mistakes in the article "Coarse homology theories" [math.AT/0106183].
An error in the paper [J. Math. Phys. 43, 6343 (2002); math-ph/0207009] is corrected. Further explanation is given.
There is a mathematical error in the first version of this paper. A new corrected version will be posted when the error is fixed, possibly with a modified title.
We continue the work of [4, 2, 3], in which we discuss published assertions that are incorrect or incorrectly proven; that are severely limited or reduce to triviality; or that we improve upon.
We point out some minor errors in a paper by the first author, and explain why they do not affect the main results in the paper.
We correct here two errors in our earlier paper "An algebraic model for finite loop spaces" [arXiv:1212.2033]
We correct a small gap found in the authors' paper 'On bounds for the effective differential Nullstellensatz' (J Algebra 449:1-21, 2016). This gap is due to an inequality that does not generally hold. However, under one additional…
This note corrects a minor misstatement in section 2 of the paper in the title (arXiv:0808.3426). It also addresses some related issues. The error does not affect the main results of that paper, but nevertheless this corrigendum seems…
We continue a discussion of published assertions that are incorrect, incorrectly proven, or trivial, in the theory of fixed points in digital topology.
This is an erratum to our paper.