Related papers: A note on a paper by R. C. Alperin
In this note, we prove Selberg's announced result on $r$-gaps between zeros of the Riemann zeta-function $\zeta$. Our proof uses a result on variations of $\arg\zeta$ by Tsang based on Selberg's method. The same result with explicit…
This paper has been removed by the author due to a misstatement in Theorem 1 and a gap in its proof. A corrected and largely extended successor (a joint work with Thomas Bauer and Tomasz Szemberg) can be found under math.AG/0312211,
We prove a number of conjectures [arXiv:2005.04066] recently stated by P. Barry, related to the paperfolding sequence and the Rueppel sequence.
In a recent series of papers Wiseman, Cavalcanti, and Rieffel have outlined and contrasted two different views about what we now call Bell's theorem. They also assert that Bell presented these two different versions at different times. This…
The main purpose of this Note is to provide a non-trivial bound on certain Kloosterman sums as considered in the recent paper of E. Fouvry [F], leading to a small improvement of his result on the Pell equation.
We correct the proof of Theorem 4.1 from [C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Soc. R. Can. \textbf{44} (2022), no. 4, 88--112].
The proofs of Theorem 3.1 and Corollary 4.1 in Le\~ao and Ohashi (2013) are incomplete. The reason is a wrong statement in Remark 2.2. The hypotheses and statements of Theorem 3.1 and Corollary 4.1 in Le\~ao and Ohashi (2013) remain…
In this note, we demonstrate that an incorrect statement has been propagated in multiple papers, stemming from the substitution of ``lim'' with ``limsup'' for a sequence in Lemma 1.3 of the paper [J. Schu: Weak and strong convergence to…
The helping Lemma 7 in [Maslowski and Wijsen, ICDT, 2014] is false. The lemma is used in (and only in) the proof of Theorem 3 of that same paper. In this corrigendum, we provide a new proof for the latter theorem.
As the reviewer have pointed out, the proof of Roelke Conjecture contains an error. For cofinite groups, we obtain a formula connecting the discrete spectrum of Laplace operator and the resonance spectrum. Using this formula, we give a…
The fundamental aim of the paper is to correct an harmful way to interpret a Goedel's erroneous remark at the Congress of Koenigsberg in 1930. Despite the Goedel's fault is rather venial, its misreading has produced and continues to produce…
Errors in Eberly's derivation of several Bell inequalities are pointed out: (1) it is based on an equation that is incorrect; (2) it uses neither two-particle states nor locality to derive Bell's inequalities and; (3) it does not use…
This note corrects a minor misstatement in section 2 of the paper in the title (arXiv:0808.3426). It also addresses some related issues. The error does not affect the main results of that paper, but nevertheless this corrigendum seems…
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due a crucial mistake in Lemma 2
We find it absurd that Walliser [1] essentially used the same analysis and obtained identical results as reported in [3], yet arrived at different conclusions. Namely, based on an incomplete theory and using erroneous arguments, he not only…
In the note an error in Low and Lapsley's article ("Optimization Flow Control, I: Basic Algorithm and Convergence", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 7(6), pp. 861-874, 1999) is pointed out. Because of this error the proof of the Theorem…
It has been pointed out to the author by David Glickenstein that the proof of the (closely related) Lemmas 1.2 and 3.2 in the title paper is incorrect. The statements of both Lemmas are correct, and the purpose of this note is to give a…
In this comment, I point out to several mathematical mistakes in the above-referenced letter.
The note complements topological aspects of the theory of chiral algebras.
In this note, we shall point out that all ``numerically calculations'' and figures in \cite{CaFrLeVa-23} are wrong because these calculations are based on some incorrect formulas. Furthermore, by pointing out several serious errors in…