Related papers: Remarks on paper "Two-term spectral asymptotics in…

Due to the omission of a hypothesis from an elementary lemma in the author's paper "Gleason parts and point derivations for uniform algebras with dense invertible group", some of the proofs presented in that paper are flawed. We prove here…

The exact solution of the Cauchy problem of the linear theory of elasticity is given in the paper, when the initial data belong to a specific class of functions.

This technical communiqu\'e aims at correcting an erroneous statement (Lemma 2.4) in an earlier paper by the same authors concerning a sufficient condition of uniform observability for a Linear Time-Varying (LTV) system. In this earlier…

This note contains a correction of the proofs of the main results of the paper [A. Yekutieli, Deformation quantization in algebraic geometry, Adv. Math. 198 (2005), 383-432]. The results are correct as originally stated.

We make remarks on Ristroph and Zhang's [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 101}, 194502 (2008)] paper. We argue especially that due to the interferences the calibration procedures in [1] were not complete and this will induce some measurements'…

We point out that the main theorem of Ref2 := [Adv. Math. 407, Article ID 108564, 22 p. (2022)] is included in the prior research survey Ref1 := [Expo. Math., 40(2), 265-301, 2022]. For context, we also reproduce the rather simple proof…

The interpretation of tunneling data in a recent Letter by Zasadzinski et al. is incorrect.

The original versions (1 and 2) of this paper paper contain a fatal error. All my attempts to patch the error have failed. As a service to the community I explain the error in some detail.

We refute the criticism expressed in a Comment by P. J. Mart\'{\i}nez and R. Chac\'on [arXiv:2105.09308] on our paper Phys. Rev. E \textbf{97}, 032219 (2018). We first show that our paper is free of any mistakes and that the criticism…

This is an erratum to the article: "Computation of maximal projection constants" (J. Funct. Anal., 277). The statement of Lemma 3.1(2) of that paper is incorrect. As a consequence of this the proof of Theorem 1.4 is incomplete. In this…

In this paper we give some sharper refinements and generalizations of inequalities related to Shafer's inequality for the arctangent function, stated in Theorems 1, 2 and 4 in [1], by C. Mortici and H.M. Srivastava.

This work is equivalent to that in {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 123}, 259401 (2019), however, Physical Review Letters prohibited reference to the additional two points in the analysis published by Zhu et al., in {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf…

We correct a mistake in a lemma in the paper cited in the title and show that it did not affect any of the other results of the paper. To this end we prove results on linearly disjoint field extensions that do not seem to be commonly known.…

This is an addendum to a previous article, which aims to provide the proofs of some results in that paper (Theorem 7.5 and Proposition 9.15) which were removed from its final version. The reason for such omission is that these proofs follow…

It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical…

In this comment we point out numerous errors in the paper of Alhaidari cited in the title.

We correct some tables and figures in [A.P. Bustamante and R.C. Calleja, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 395 (2019), pp. 15-23, arXiv:1712.05476]. We also report on the new computations that verify the accuracy of the data and extend the…

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial error in eqn 27.

In our paper "Dendroidal sets as models for homotopy operads" (J. Topol. 4 (2011), no. 2, 257-299, and arXiv:0902.1954), we made the wrong claim about the behaviour of the tensor product with respect to cofibrations of dendroidal sets. We…

This article focuses on correcting several factual errors and critiques in the previously published Letter in Phys. Rev. L, Vol. 89, No. 10, 2022, by D. Shapira and M. Saltmarsh. The authors of the Letter did not perform their own…