Related papers: Comment on "Backflow in relativistic wave equation…
Some difficulties, both numerical and conceptual, of the method to compute one dimensional wave functions by numerically integrating the quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equation, presented in the paper mentioned in the title, are analyzed. The…
A recent Comment [arXiv:0811.2790] on the Letter 'Quantum Bounce and Cosmic Recall' by the authors is shown to arise from an incorrect understanding of the issues at hand and of our analysis. The conclusions of Bojowald's Comment are shown…
A reply to the comment by S. Friedemann et al. [arXiv:1207.0536] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].
We point out that an erroneous derivation in the recent paper [Fetecau et al., Nonlinear Anal. RWA 12 (2011) 1] yields a correct solution by accident. Additionally, a number of misrepresentations and inaccuracies in the latter recent paper…
arXiv admin note: This paper has been withdrawn by arXiv due to disputed and unverifiable authorship and affiliation
This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in arXiv:2306.16756 on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)
We provide a comment on "Velocity slip coefficients based on the hard-sphere Boltzmann equation" by Livio Gibelli published in Phys. Fluids 24, 022001 (2012).
This is a comment on arXiv:physics/0608292, subsequently published in Phys Rev Lett, 98, 014501 (2007), in which Willis and Kerswell study in direct numerical simulations the statistics of turbulent lifetimes in pipe flow. They suggest that…
A Comment on the Letter by C. R. Galley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 174301 (2013).
Reply to the comment by D.N. Aristov and A.G. Yashenkin (cond-mat/9612245) on PRL by Balatsky and Salkola (Phys. Rev. Lett., V76, 2386, (1996), cond-mat/9602034).
The paper by Bowen, Mancini, Fessatidis, and Murawski (2012 Phys. Scr. {\bf 85}, 065005) demonstrates in a dramatic fashion the serious difficulties that can arise when one rushes to perform numerical studies before understanding the…
We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev A. 96, 022126 (2017). In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.
F. Rohrlich has recently published two papers, including the paper under review, advocating a particular delay-differential equation as an approximate equation of motion for classical charged particles, which he characterizes as providing a…
This is a reply to arXiv:1409.7513 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 138901 (2014)].
The recent study by Waclawczyk et al. [J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 175501 (2017)] possesses three shortcomings: (i) The analysis misses a key aspect of the LMN equations which makes their Lie-group symmetry results incomplete. In…
Comment on paper by Blanchette and Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 144501 (2009).
Invited contribution to Annalen der Physik (Expert Opinion).
Direct reproduction of Bialynicki-Birula's quantum solutions using the authors' own equations and initial conditions reveals two fundamental flaws. First, the eigenfunctions exhibit divergence in the region $y<0$, contradicting the claimed…
Inconsistencies are pointed out in a recent proposal [L. Diosi, Phys. Rev. A 80, 064104 (2009); arXiv:0905.3908v1] for a quantum version of the classical linear Boltzmann equation.
Discussion on "Brownian distance covariance" by G\'{a}bor J. Sz\'{e}kely and Maria L. Rizzo [arXiv:1010.0297]