Related papers: Letter/Comment on: Improved predictions for superc…

An invited Commentary in: Nature Reviews Physics 3, 7 (2021).

A Reply to the Comment by C. Ciuti and P. Nataf [arXiv:1112.0986v1] on our Letter "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113602 (2011)].

A Comment on the Letter by M. Rupp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 058301 (2012).

Comment on B.A. Bernevig, D. Giuliano, and R.B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3392 (2001).

A Comment on the Letter by O. Viehmann, J. von Delft, and F. Marquardt [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 107}, 113602 (2011)].

We analyze in great detail the mathematical derivations from the article "Doppler signature in electrodynamic retarded potentials" by Giovanni Perosa, Simone Di Mitri, William A. Barletta, and Fulvio Parmigiani, published in Physics Open…

An experiment is proposed to test the prediction that induced supercurrents in a superconductor can become superluminal, as was predicted in the paper by S.J. Minter, K. Wegter-McNelly, R.Y. Chiao, Physica E 42 (2010) 234.

Comment on the Letter by W. Rantner and X-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. v.86, p.3871 (2001).

This is a reply to the Comment on 'Spin Decoherence in Superconducting Atom Chips' [arXiv:quant-ph/0610095 (2006)].

A Comment on the Letter by C. R. Galley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 174301 (2013).

We make comments on Gaidarzhy {\it et al.}'s [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} 94, 030402 (2005)] letter.

Comment on the paper Schiavoni et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 094101 (2003).

A comment on the letter by M. Machida and T. Koyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 140401 (2005) and also on the preprint by Y. Kawaguchi and T. Ohmi, cond-mat/0411018.

We reply to the criticism raised by Volovik in his Comment (cond-mat/9805159) and by Hirschfeld et al. in their Comment (cond-mat/9806085).

We reply to David's comment (hep-lat/9504017) on our paper Phys.Rev.Lett. 74(1995)1920.

A Comment on the Letter by D. Hemanth Kumar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 144301 (2004)

A comment on a recent paper (PRL {\bf 94}, 226405 (2005)) by S. De Palo, M. Botti, S. Moroni, and Gaetano Senatore.

Comment on "New Mean-Field Theory of the tt't"J Model Applied to the High-Tc Superconductors" by T. C. Ribeiro and X.-G. Wen [cond-mat/0410750; Physical Review Letters 95, 057001 (2005)].

Comment on the paper "Critical State Theory for Nonparallel Flux Line Lattices in Type-II Superconductors" by A. Badia and C. Lopez is presented here.

This Comment points out a number of errors in the recent paper by Zarechnaya, Dubrovinskaia, Dubrovinsky, et al. (Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 185501 (2009)). Results and conclusions presented by Zarechnaya et al. (2009) are either incorrect or…