Related papers: Response to "Entanglement growth in diffusive syst…

We reply to misleading claims made in a comment to our work by Birse and McGovern in arXiv:1708.09341.

Comments on the article "Pulsar dynamics: magnetic dipole model revisited".

A discussion on the robustness of continuous-variable entangled states under noisy environment is briefly given in direct relation to Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 100503 (2010).

Discussion of "Estimating Random Effects via Adjustment for Density Maximization" by C. Morris and R. Tang [arXiv:1108.3234]

Discussion of "Estimating Random Effects via Adjustment for Density Maximization" by C. Morris and R. Tang [arXiv:1108.3234]

A reply on the comment of Bertin, Chate, Ginelli, Gregoire, Leonard and Peshkov, arxiv:1404.3950v1, in this special issue.

Reply to the Comment of Luo, Xiang, and Wang, cond-mat/0212580.

Reply to the comment by D.N. Aristov and A.G. Yashenkin (cond-mat/9612245) on PRL by Balatsky and Salkola (Phys. Rev. Lett., V76, 2386, (1996), cond-mat/9602034).

Rejoinder of "Estimating Random Effects via Adjustment for Density Maximization" by C. Morris and R. Tang [arXiv:1108.3234]

Some remarks are made on the theoretical interpretation of recent experimental results on the propagation speed of electromagnetic force fields.

Addendum to the paper Combinatorics of the Modular Group II The Kontsevich integrals, hep-th/9201001, by C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber (3 pages)

We comment on the recent paper by Balog and Niedermaier [hep-th/9701156].

Comment on: L.F. Cugliandolo and J.L. Iguain; Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85} 3448 (2000)

In a recent preprint by Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, Unanyan, Fleischhauer and Sirker [arxiv:2203.06689] the authors comment on our work which studied the number entropy in strongly disordered systems. The data presented in the comment does not…

In this note, we present an improvement on the large orbit result of Halasi and Podoski, and then answer an open question raised by Chen, Cossey, Lewis, and Tong-Viet.

We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review A, Vol. 101, 023843 (2020), raised by H. Schuermann and V. Serov in arXiv:2204.05846.

In this Comment we discuss some points concerning the modeling of parked cars proposed in the article by Rawal and Rodgers, Physica A (2005). We also introduce another approach to this problem which leads to a better description of the…

We reply to comment on recent paper by Pieplow and Henkel (New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 023027) and our results made by Volokitin and Persson (arXiv: 1405.2525)

This note replies Dr. Jensen (2010) comments on Problem 2.3, which was left in Fuh (2010). In the following, we use the same notations and definitions in Fuh (2006) unless specified.

This is a perspective on "k-stretchability of entanglement, and the duality of k-separability and k-producibility" by Szil\'ard Szalay, published in Quantum 3, 204 (2019).