English
Related papers

Related papers: Comment on `Open is not forever: a study of vanish…

200 papers

Contribution to the discussion of "When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?" by Dan Jackson and Ian R. White (2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201800071).

Methodology · Statistics 2018-11-06 Christian Röver , Tim Friede

I give a brief overview of arXiv history, and describe the current state of arXiv practice, both technical and sociological. This commentary originally appeared in the EMBO Journal, 19 Oct 2016. It was intended as an update on comments from…

Digital Libraries · Computer Science 2017-06-29 P. Ginsparg

We briefly remind references and arguments, already discussed in the past, which confute erroneous claims in arXiv:1210.5501.

This paper collects some problems that I have encountered during the years, have puzzled me and which, to the best of my knowledge, are still open. Most of them are well-known and have been first stated by other authors. In this sad season…

Analysis of PDEs · Mathematics 2020-03-26 Giovanni Alessandrini

We reply to the preceding Comment by E. van Beveren et al., arXiv:0811.2589 [hep-ph].

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Physics 2009-07-30 Francesco Giacosa , Thomas Gutsche , Valery E. Lyubovitskij

This study looked for remnant data on enterprise level hard drives that were purchased through auctions. The drives were analysed for information, be it topical or formatted. In the event that drives were formatted, forensic tools were used…

Cryptography and Security · Computer Science 2012-07-26 Craig Valli , Andrew Woodward

We reply to the criticisms of our publication (N. Hasegawa, K. Hagino, and Y. Tanimura, Phys. Lett. B808, 135693 (2020)) made by A. Ono in his recent article, arXiv:2201.02966.

Nuclear Theory · Physics 2022-02-02 N. Hasegawa , K. Hagino , Y. Tanimura

It has been shown (S. Lawrence, 2001, Nature, 411, 521) that journal articles which have been posted without charge on the internet are more heavily cited than those which have not been. Using data from the NASA Astrophysics Data System…

Brief response to a Reply [arXiv:1005.2615] on our Comments [arXiv:1005.0838] on XENON100 recent results [arXiv:1005.0380].

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Physics 2010-05-21 J. I. Collar , D. N. McKinsey

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an extended and largely modified version of the paper was published in arXiv (see arXiv:0807.3694, Disjoint minimal graphs).

Differential Geometry · Mathematics 2009-08-20 Vladimir G. Tkachev

After our publication of the observed first indication for neutrinoless double beta decay in [KK-Evid01], a number of papers have been published [KK-Sar_Evid01,KK2-Sar_Evid01,KK3-Sar_Evid01,Ma02-Ev,Barg02-Ev,Ueh02-Ev,Mi…

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Physics 2007-05-23 H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to measure the coverage of Google Scholar for the Library and Information Science (LIS) journal literature as identified by a list of core LIS journals from a study by Schloegl and Petschnig (2005).…

Digital Libraries · Computer Science 2015-11-19 Dirk Lewandowski

I give a comment on arXiv:1802.01804v3 [hep-ph]

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Physics 2018-07-19 Dirk Dubbers

This paper replies the comments by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 75, 844-845 (2007)] and V. Hnizdo [Am. J. Phys. 75, 845-846 (2007)].

Classical Physics · Physics 2008-12-31 Jose A. Heras

This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, hep-ph/0701081

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Physics 2007-05-23 A. E. Inopin

Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]

Methodology · Statistics 2010-01-19 Dennis Lindley

Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]

Methodology · Statistics 2010-01-19 Arnold Zellner

Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]

Methodology · Statistics 2010-01-19 Stephen Senn

Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]

Methodology · Statistics 2010-01-19 José M. Bernardo