Related papers: Comment on "Nonlinear electromagnetic response and…

We reveal that due to the presence of disorder oscillations of the order parameter amplitude called the Higgs mode can be effectively excited by the external electromagnetic radiation in usual BCS superconductors. This mechanism works for…

Comments on "Giant Dielectric Response in the One-Dimensional Charge-Ordered Semiconductor (NbSe_{4})_{3}I" (D. Staresinic et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 046402 (2006)) and "Colossal Magnetocapacitance and Colossal Magnetoresistance in…

Comment on Proximity breakdown of hydrides in superconducting niobium cavities [arXiv:1212.3384].

Reply to the Comment [arXiv:1609.04476] on a recent work in PRL [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 036601 (2016), arXiv:1511.02994v2].

Errata are given for J.F. Gunion and H.E. Haber, Nucl. Phys. B272 (1986) 1, Nucl. Phys. B278 (1986) 449, and Nucl. Phys. B307 (1988) 445.

Reply to A. M. M. Pruisken and I. S. Burmistrov: cond-mat/0504763

Letter/comment on M. Rini, Physics $\textbf{13}$, s94 (July 27, 2020) and A. Sanna et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. $\textbf{125}$, 057001 (2020).

We comment on the paper ``Numerical study of the SWKB condition of novel classes of exactly solvable systems'' [Y. Nasuda and N. Sawado, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36, 2150025 (2021)]. We show that it misrepresents our prior work [J. Bougie, A.…

We regret that PRL did not accept our Reply for publication. We believe that both our Reply and the original paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 135901 (2017)) is sound and correct. We post our reply here and let readers to judge.

Comment on a recent paper published in Physical Review Letters by M. C. Wang, S. Qiao, Z. Jiang, S. N. Luo, and J. Qi [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 036601 (2016), arXiv:1511.02994v2].

We reply to the criticism raised by Volovik in his Comment (cond-mat/9805159) and by Hirschfeld et al. in their Comment (cond-mat/9806085).

This is an extended Reply to Comment by A. Sergeev, M.Y. Reizer, and V. Mitin [arXiv:0906.2389] on our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 067001 (2009)]. We explicitly demonstrate that all claims by Sergeev et al. are completely unfounded,…

An invited Commentary in: Nature Reviews Physics 3, 7 (2021).

In this communication we present our response to the recent comment of A. Engel regarding our paper on FIB- fabricated Nb nanowires (see Vol. 20 (2009) Pag. 465302). After further analysis and additional experimental evidence, we conclude…

This Comment points out a number of errors in the recent paper by Zarechnaya, Dubrovinskaia, Dubrovinsky, et al. (Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 185501 (2009)). Results and conclusions presented by Zarechnaya et al. (2009) are either incorrect or…

This is our formal Reply to revised version (v2) of arXiv: nucl-th/0510004v2.

We reply to David's comment (hep-lat/9504017) on our paper Phys.Rev.Lett. 74(1995)1920.

I review recent developments in the theory and phenomenology of Higgs bosons at an $\epem$ linear collider with $\sqrt s$ of order 500 GeV.

Comment on the paper "Novel Convective Instabilities in a Magnetic Fluid" by W. Luo, T. Du, and J. Huang, Phys. Rev. Lett., v.82, p.4134 (1999).

Higgs mode in superconductors, i.e. the collective amplitude mode of the order parameter does not associate with charge nor spin fluctuations, therefore it does not couple to the electromagnetic field in the linear response regime. On the…