Related papers: Remarks on Lin-Nakamura-Wang's paper

It is shown that ''Theorem 1'' of the article ''Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Is Incorrect'' by G.-L. Li and V.O.K. Li (see quant-ph/0509089) is false. Therefore the assertion expressed in the title of that article is…

We present our response to Pierre Thibault's article, titled "Feasibility of 3D reconstruction from a single 2D diffraction measurement" [1], in which he commented upon our recent ankylography paper [2]. While we appreciate Thibault's…

We comment on the recent manuscript by Raines et al. [arXiv:0905.0269v2] (now published in Nature, vol. 463, p. 214-217, 2010), which suggests that in certain conditions a single diffraction measurement may be sufficient to reconstruct the…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a critical error in the proof of Theorem A pointed out by Burkhard Wilking.

In this short note we prove by a counter-example that Theorem 3.2 in the paper "A study on concave optimization via canonical dual function" by J. Zhu, S. Tao, D. Gao is false; moreover, we give a very short proof for Theorem 3.1 in the…

An explicit calculation shows that the model constructed in arXiv:1806.00648 violates general covariance. It is therefore unphysical and does not determine properties of space-time or black holes.

It is demonstrated that remarks and criticism in work [1] (arXiv:1005.2436 nucl-th) have resulted from inattentive reading of work [2] (Phys. Rev.C 81, 035501 (2010)) or just some misunderstanding and do not influence conclusions of work…

The present note is to make minor correction on the assumption of Theorem 1.2 and its proof in our paper [arXiv:2111.02059, Jinrui Huang, Yinghui Wang, Huanyao Wen and Rizhao Zi, {\it J. Differential Equations}, 306(2022), 456--491].

This is a corrigendum of Lemma 9.1 of the paper [FOOO3] in the title. This lemma is not correct as pointed out by A. Daemi and a referee of the paper [DF]. The corrigendum does not affect the applications of this lemma in [FOOO3] and other…

It is shown that a recent article by Z.-D. Zhang [arXiv:0705.1045] is in error and violates well-known theorems.

We withdraw this paper due to insufficient arguments in the derivation of Theorem 1. See quant-ph/0005062 for the new paper

This note was an attempt to complete a gap in the proof of Theorem 11.1 of the paper arXiv:1111.5992. Due to a critical gap in the proof of Lemma 4.3, this paper is withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn. Theorem 2.1 of the paper is false, as it contradicts a result of Srinvas (Crelle's J. v.381, 1987). The error in our proof is in the construction of a functor in Claim 2. What we construct does not preserve…

This paper has been withdrawn, see the replacement arXiv:1302.6670.

We concur with de Castro's observation that the gauge considerations of our approach are not valid. Nevertheless, except for an error that will be corrected, all of our findings are accurate independent of those considerations.

It is shown that the arguments in the reply of Z.-D. Zhang (arXiv:0812.0194) to the comment arXiv:0811.1802 defending his conjectures in arXiv:0705.1045 are invalid. His conjectures have been thoroughly disproved.

We briefly remind references and arguments, already discussed in the past, which confute erroneous claims in arXiv:1210.5501.

The dimensional-deconstruction prescription of Arkani-Hamed, Cohen, Kaplan, Karch and Motl provides a mechanism for recovering the $A$-type (2,0) theories on $T^2$, starting from a four-dimensional $\mathcal N=2$ circular-quiver theory. We…

In this paper we propose a domain sampling type reconstruction scheme for an inverse boundary value problem to identify an unknown cavity by single measurement on the accessible boundary of a known electric or heat conductive medium. Here…

The arguments of the above article [arXiv:0910.3934] do not apply to the papers which it criticizes, and contain several key errors, including a fundamental misunderstanding about the equivalence principle.