Related papers: Comment on "Experimental retrodiction of trajector…

Comment on Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2086 (2001)

In this note, the correction to the proof of one theorem in some our previous paper [arXiv:1302.0589] will be given.

We report a corrigendum to the paper 'Viscous propulsion in active transversely-isotropic media' [J. Fluid Mech. 812, 501-524, 2017 / arxiv 1608.01451].

The criticism of the experiment showing discontinuous traces of photons passing through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer is shown to be unfounded.

While much of the technical analysis in the preceding Comment [1] is correct, in the end it confirms the conclusion reached in my previous work [2]: a consistent histories analysis provides no support for the claim of counterfactual quantum…

An error in the paper [J. Math. Phys. 43, 6343 (2002); math-ph/0207009] is corrected. Further explanation is given.

This note corrects Example 3.2 in Two-Variable Wiman-Valiron Theory and PDEs by the authors which appeared in Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn Math. (35) (2010), 571-580.

This is erratum of the paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 4260 (2000)]

A comment has been recently posted on the arXiv (arXiv:1902.07504) that discuss our recent work on encircling multiple exceptional points in Nat. Commun. 9, 4808 (2018). In that comment, the authors claim that our approach is prone to…

This is an erratum to our paper in Physical Review D82:022004,2010, corresponding to preprint: arXiv:1003.2961 .

We reply to the recent comment cond-mat/9810097 on our original Letter `Roughening Transition of Interfaces in Disordered Systems', Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1469 (1998).

The recent criticism of Vaidman's propsal for the analysis of the past of a particle in the nested interferometer is refuted. It is shown that the definition of the past of the particle adopted by Englert et al. [Phys. Rev. A 96, 022126…

Letter/comment on M. Rini, Physics $\textbf{13}$, s94 (July 27, 2020) and A. Sanna et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. $\textbf{125}$, 057001 (2020).

We briefly remind references and arguments, already discussed in the past, which confute erroneous claims in arXiv:1210.5501.

After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…

Correction to Annals of Probability 29 (2001) 1612--1624 [doi:10.1214/aop/1015345764].

The original versions (1 and 2) of this paper paper contain a fatal error. All my attempts to patch the error have failed. As a service to the community I explain the error in some detail.

First version: del Barco et al. submitted recently a comment [arXiv:0812.4070] on our latest Phys. Rev. Lett. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 237204 (2008)], claiming three basic mistakes. We show here that their claims are unjustified and based on…

In this note we correct two errors in our paper "On the Homology of Completion and Torsion", arXiv:1010.4386, that appeared in Algebras and Representation Theory (2014).

A recent publication [D.G. Jenkins, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{80}, 054303 (2009)] claims to discredit the experimental observation of two-proton decay of the (21$^+$) high-spin isomer in $^{94}$Ag [I. Mukha \emph{et al.,} Nature (London)…